HOOW vs. QTAP

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP).

HOOW and QTAP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HOOW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jun 18, 2025. QTAP is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021.

Performance

HOOW vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HOOW vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	-44.41%	46.56%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	3.02%	8.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOW achieves a -44.41% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 3.02% return.

HOOW

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: -13.07%
• YTD: -44.41%
• 6M: -58.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTAP

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: 1.79%
• YTD: 3.02%
• 6M: 5.43%
• 1Y: 21.08%
• 3Y*: 19.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOW vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

HOOW

Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF

QTAP

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April

Return for Risk

HOOW vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 80
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOW vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HOOW	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.28	0.64	-0.92

Correlation

The correlation between HOOW and QTAP is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HOOW vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

HOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 163.81%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	163.81%	67.92%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HOOW vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOW drawdown since its inception was -65.74%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOW and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOOW	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.74%	-29.44%	-36.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.25%	0.00%	-62.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.06%	-5.21%	-17.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.68%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HOOW	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.88%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.23%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	82.31%	16.38%	+65.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.31%	19.03%	+63.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	82.31%	19.03%	+63.28%