HOOW vs. QTAP

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HOOW returned -6.96% vs 20.69% for QTAP. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HOOW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.

Performance

HOOW vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOW achieves a -12.18% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 13.89% return.

HOOW

• 1D: -9.53%
• 1M: 10.78%
• 6M: -9.72%
• YTD: -12.18%
• 1Y: -6.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTAP

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -0.16%
• 6M: 13.32%
• YTD: 13.89%
• 1Y: 20.69%
• 3Y*: 18.98%
• 5Y*: 12.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOW vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	-12.18%	52.60%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	13.89%	9.04%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOW and QTAP is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.49

The correlation between HOOW and QTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

HOOW vs. QTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HOOW	QTAP
Financial Services	3.5%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.3%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	8.7%
Energy	-	0.7%
Healthcare	-	5.1%
Industrials	-	3.3%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	50.7%
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

HOOW vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOW

HOOW Risk / Return Rank: 10
HOOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
HOOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
HOOW Omega Ratio Rank: 13
HOOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
HOOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOW vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOOW	QTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.08	3.34	-3.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.49	5.37	-4.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.81	-0.75
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.11	8.34	-8.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.18	42.65	-42.83

HOOW vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOW Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOW and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HOOW vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOW drawdown since its inception was -65.74%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOW and QTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOOW	QTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.74%	-29.44%	-36.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.74%	-2.49%	-63.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.36%	-0.78%	-39.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.49%	-4.94%	-25.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.31%	0.49%	+38.82%

Volatility

HOOW vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) has a higher volatility of 24.01% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 2.45%. This indicates that HOOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOOW	QTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.01%	2.45%	+21.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	64.40%	5.24%	+59.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	84.21%	6.23%	+77.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.98%	18.92%	+65.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.98%	18.62%	+65.36%

HOOW vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOOW vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

HOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 133.11%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	133.11%	67.92%
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOOW and QTAP in my portfolio?

HOOW and QTAP have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HOOW or QTAP?

HOOW has higher volatility (24.01%) compared to QTAP (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOW dropped -65.74% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

Which ETF is better, HOOW or QTAP?

On 1-year performance, QTAP leads with 20.69% vs -6.96% for HOOW. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HOOW or QTAP?

Over the 1-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 20.69% return vs -6.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOOW or QTAP?

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HOOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOOW or QTAP?

HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 133.11%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.

What is the main difference between HOOW and QTAP?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HOOW and 0.79% for QTAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.