HOOW vs. GPIQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOOW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Both are actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HOOW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.

Performance

HOOW vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOW achieves a -34.08% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 18.30% return.

HOOW

• 1D: -7.51%
• 1M: 8.18%
• YTD: -34.08%
• 6M: -46.41%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GPIQ

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 8.51%
• YTD: 18.30%
• 6M: 17.64%
• 1Y: 37.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOW vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	-34.08%	46.56%
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	18.30%	15.67%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOW and GPIQ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	0.60

HOOW vs. GPIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HOOW	GPIQ
Financial Services	3.3%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Energy	-	0.6%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Industrials	-	2.9%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	53.8%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

HOOW vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIQ

GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 81
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 82
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOW vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HOOW	GPIQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	1.78	-1.83

Drawdowns

HOOW vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOW drawdown since its inception was -65.74%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOW and GPIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOOW	GPIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.74%	-21.06%	-44.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.23%	-0.19%	-55.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.13%	-2.27%	-26.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.15%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HOOW	GPIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.44%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	83.86%	13.40%	+70.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.86%	17.47%	+66.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.86%	17.47%	+66.39%

HOOW vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOOW vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

HOOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 163.90%, more than GPIQ's 9.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	9.32%	9.81%	9.18%	1.74%
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	163.90%	67.92%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOOW and GPIQ in my portfolio?

HOOW and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HOOW or GPIQ?

On fees, GPIQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOOW or GPIQ?

GPIQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HOOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOOW or GPIQ?

HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 163.90%, compared with 9.32% for GPIQ.

What is the main difference between HOOW and GPIQ?

HOOW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for HOOW and 0.29% for GPIQ.