HOOG vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HOOG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HOOG returned -5.85% vs 2.91% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. HOOG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

HOOG vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOG achieves a -37.65% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.18% return.

HOOG

• 1D: -4.37%
• 1M: 92.50%
• YTD: -37.65%
• 6M: -47.26%
• 1Y: -5.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 2.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOG vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	-37.65%	320.19%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.18%	2.45%

Correlation

The correlation between HOOG and BAMU is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025	-0.07

The correlation between HOOG and BAMU shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HOOG vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOG

HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 12
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 17
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOG vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOOG	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.04	5.01	-5.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	8.84	-7.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	2.43	-1.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.07	24.72	-24.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.11	97.90	-98.00

HOOG vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOG Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOG and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HOOG vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOG drawdown since its inception was -86.94%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOG and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOOG	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.94%	-0.36%	-86.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-86.94%	-0.12%	-86.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.92%	0.00%	-70.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.94%	-0.02%	-38.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	55.79%	0.03%	+55.76%

Volatility

HOOG vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a higher volatility of 46.00% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that HOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOOG	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	46.00%	0.09%	+45.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	101.86%	0.40%	+101.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	139.56%	0.58%	+138.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	144.89%	0.87%	+144.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	144.89%	0.87%	+144.02%

HOOG vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOOG vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.73%, more than BAMU's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	19.73%	12.30%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOOG and BAMU in my portfolio?

HOOG and BAMU have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HOOG or BAMU?

HOOG has higher volatility (46.00%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOG dropped -86.94% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, HOOG or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, BAMU leads with 2.91% vs -5.85% for HOOG. On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HOOG or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, BAMU has performed better with a 2.91% return vs -5.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOOG or BAMU?

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOOG or BAMU?

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 19.73%, compared with 3.05% for BAMU.

What is the main difference between HOOG and BAMU?

HOOG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HOOG and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.