PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOOG vs. ADBG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOOG vs. ADBG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOOG achieves a -55.34% return, which is significantly lower than ADBG's -52.15% return.


HOOG

1D
12.78%
1M
23.20%
YTD
-55.34%
6M
-70.69%
1Y
-21.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ADBG

1D
1.66%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
-52.15%
6M
-46.56%
1Y
-69.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOOG vs. ADBG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOOG and ADBG is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOOG vs. ADBG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

ADBG
ADBG Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
ADBG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADBG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADBG Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
ADBG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADBG Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOOG vs. ADBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HOOGADBGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.78

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.25

-0.92

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.40

-1.39

+0.98

HOOG vs. ADBG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOOG Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is higher than the ADBG Sharpe Ratio of -1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOOG and ADBG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOOGADBGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

-1.04

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

-0.90

+1.31

Drawdowns

HOOG vs. ADBG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOOG drawdown since its inception was -86.94%, which is greater than ADBG's maximum drawdown of -76.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOOG and ADBG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOOGADBGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.94%

-76.71%

-10.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.94%

-76.23%

-10.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.17%

-70.94%

-8.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.70%

-41.74%

+4.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.46%

50.32%

+3.14%

Volatility

HOOG vs. ADBG - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a higher volatility of 43.09% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG) at 27.74%. This indicates that HOOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADBG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOOGADBGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

43.09%

27.74%

+15.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.33%

56.25%

+45.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

137.25%

67.12%

+70.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

145.07%

66.85%

+78.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

145.07%

66.85%

+78.22%

HOOG vs. ADBG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HOOG and ADBG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

HOOG vs. ADBG - Dividend Comparison

HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.55%, while ADBG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


HOOG and ADBG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOOG has higher volatility (43.09%) compared to ADBG (27.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOOG dropped -86.94% vs ADBG's -76.71%.

On 1-year performance, HOOG leads with -21.60% vs -69.78% for ADBG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, ADBG has been the lower-risk option at 27.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HOOG has performed better with a -21.60% return vs -69.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HOOG and ADBG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 27.55%, compared with 0.00% for ADBG.

HOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOOG and ADBG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer