HOMZ vs. XME
HOMZ (Hoya Capital Housing ETF) and XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) are both Materials funds - HOMZ tracks the Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index while XME tracks the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HOMZ returned 3.51%/yr vs 23.59%/yr for XME. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HOMZ charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XME.
Performance
HOMZ vs. XME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOMZ achieves a -3.23% return, which is significantly lower than XME's 24.13% return.
HOMZ
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- -3.23%
- 6M
- -6.20%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- —
XME
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- 9.89%
- YTD
- 24.13%
- 6M
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 103.84%
- 3Y*
- 40.26%
- 5Y*
- 23.59%
- 10Y*
- 20.21%
HOMZ vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF | -3.23% | 2.72% | 9.49% | 36.49% | -28.14% | 41.02% | 15.80% | 17.71% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 24.13% | 83.47% | -4.54% | 21.51% | 13.13% | 34.92% | 15.95% | 0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOMZ and XME is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019 | 0.56 |
The correlation between HOMZ and XME shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HOMZ vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HOMZ
XME
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
HOMZ
XME
-
Consumer Cyclical
HOMZ
XME
-
Financial Services
HOMZ
XME
-
Industrials
HOMZ
XME
Basic Materials
HOMZ
XME
Technology
HOMZ
XME
Consumer Defensive
HOMZ
XME
Communication Services
HOMZ
XME
-
Energy
HOMZ
-
XME
Healthcare
HOMZ
-
XME
-
Utilities
HOMZ
-
XME
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOMZ vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank
HOMZ
XME
HOMZ vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HOMZ | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.44 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 4.62 | -4.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.67 | 11.75 | -11.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HOMZ | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | 3.02 | -2.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.73 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.18 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
HOMZ vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOMZ drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOMZ and XME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOMZ | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.10% | -85.89% | +37.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.71% | -22.60% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.91% | -30.47% | +7.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.76% | -37.27% | +3.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.58% | -3.24% | -9.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.74% | -44.14% | +34.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.35% | 8.87% | -1.52% |
Volatility
HOMZ vs. XME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) is 5.34%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 12.42%. This indicates that HOMZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOMZ | XME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 12.42% | -7.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.56% | 26.73% | -13.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 34.65% | -15.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 32.54% | -11.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.99% | 32.84% | -7.85% |
HOMZ vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison
HOMZ has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
HOMZ vs. XME - Dividend Comparison
HOMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than XME's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF | 2.74% | 2.54% | 2.13% | 2.08% | 2.03% | 1.21% | 3.18% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOMZ and XME have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XME has higher volatility (12.42%) compared to HOMZ (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOMZ dropped -48.10% vs XME's -85.89%.
On 5-year performance, XME leads with 23.59% vs 3.51% for HOMZ. On fees, HOMZ is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, HOMZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XME has performed better with a 23.59% return vs 3.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HOMZ is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XME.
HOMZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 0.30% for XME.
HOMZ tracks Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index, while XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Pettee Investors and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HOMZ and 0.35% for XME.
XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOMZ and XME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer