PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOLA vs. SPYH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOLA vs. SPYH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOLA achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than SPYH's 6.15% return.


HOLA

1D
0.28%
1M
1.14%
YTD
4.14%
6M
6.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYH

1D
0.04%
1M
3.31%
YTD
6.15%
6M
6.77%
1Y
19.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOLA vs. SPYH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HOLA and SPYH is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.68

HOLA vs. SPYH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HOLA
SPYH

Financial Services

23.9%
12.0%

Industrials

15.5%
7.8%

Technology

11.9%
35.5%

Healthcare

9.5%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
9.9%

Basic Materials

5.2%
1.7%

Communication Services

3.1%
11.4%

Utilities

2.7%
2.5%

Energy

2.6%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.0%
2.0%

Financial Services

HOLA
23.9%
SPYH
12.0%

Industrials

HOLA
15.5%
SPYH
7.8%

Technology

HOLA
11.9%
SPYH
35.5%

Healthcare

HOLA
9.5%
SPYH
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

HOLA
6.5%
SPYH
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HOLA
6.2%
SPYH
9.9%

Basic Materials

HOLA
5.2%
SPYH
1.7%

Communication Services

HOLA
3.1%
SPYH
11.4%

Utilities

HOLA
2.7%
SPYH
2.5%

Energy

HOLA
2.6%
SPYH
3.6%

Real Estate

HOLA
1.0%
SPYH
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOLA vs. SPYH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOLA

SPYH
SPYH Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SPYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYH Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYH Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOLA vs. SPYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HOLA vs. SPYH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HOLASPYHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

1.97

-0.53

Drawdowns

HOLA vs. SPYH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOLA drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, which is greater than SPYH's maximum drawdown of -6.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLA and SPYH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOLASPYHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-6.39%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

0.00%

-1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-0.71%

-0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

Volatility

HOLA vs. SPYH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOLASPYHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.52%

7.79%

+1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.52%

12.37%

-2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.52%

12.37%

-2.85%

HOLA vs. SPYH - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOLA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYH's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

HOLA vs. SPYH - Dividend Comparison

HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than SPYH's 7.52% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HOLA and SPYH have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HOLA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HOLA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYH.

SPYH has the higher dividend yield at 7.52%, compared with 2.90% for HOLA.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HOLA and 0.68% for SPYH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOLA and SPYH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer