HOG vs. CSB
HOG (Harley-Davidson, Inc.) is a stock, while CSB (VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) is Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. Over the past 10 years, HOG returned -3.62%/yr vs 9.94%/yr for CSB. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
HOG vs. CSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HOG achieves a 28.97% return, which is significantly higher than CSB's 15.17% return. Over the past 10 years, HOG has underperformed CSB with an annualized return of -3.62%, while CSB has yielded a comparatively higher 9.94% annualized return.
HOG
- 1D
- 3.47%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 25.54%
- YTD
- 28.97%
- 1Y
- 11.64%
- 3Y*
- -8.03%
- 5Y*
- -7.64%
- 10Y*
- -3.62%
CSB
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- YTD
- 15.17%
- 1Y
- 22.22%
- 3Y*
- 12.31%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.94%
HOG vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOG Harley-Davidson, Inc. | 28.97% | -30.05% | -16.61% | -9.76% | 12.13% | 4.29% | 0.19% | 13.62% | -30.54% | -10.29% |
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 15.17% | 2.26% | 9.64% | 12.60% | -13.11% | 27.04% | 11.30% | 21.12% | -7.10% | 11.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between HOG and CSB is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015 | 0.58 |
The correlation between HOG and CSB shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HOG vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank
HOG
CSB
HOG vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HOG | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.29 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | 3.11 | -2.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.50 | 9.05 | -8.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HOG vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HOG drawdown since its inception was -88.26%, which is greater than CSB's maximum drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOG and CSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HOG | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.26% | -42.07% | -46.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.24% | -7.18% | -36.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.74% | -21.82% | -36.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.11% | -24.49% | -39.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.28% | -42.07% | -31.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.61% | 0.00% | -52.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.49% | -7.07% | -17.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.51% | 2.46% | +21.05% |
Volatility
HOG vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison
Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG) has a higher volatility of 10.03% compared to VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) at 3.63%. This indicates that HOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HOG | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.03% | 3.63% | +6.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.77% | 9.13% | +19.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.09% | 14.10% | +26.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.46% | 18.63% | +21.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.47% | 21.24% | +21.23% |
Dividends
HOG vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison
HOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than CSB's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.13% | 3.54% | 3.12% | 3.45% | 3.60% | 3.11% | 3.70% | 3.19% | 3.45% | 3.19% | 2.85% | 1.57% |
HOG Harley-Davidson, Inc. | 2.83% | 3.51% | 2.29% | 1.79% | 1.51% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 4.03% | 4.34% | 2.87% | 2.40% | 2.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HOG and CSB have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOG has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to CSB (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOG dropped -88.26% vs CSB's -42.07%.
CSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HOG and CSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer