PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MPC vs. COP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MPC and COP is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

MPC vs. COP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
848.97%
163.68%
MPC
COP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MPC:

-0.31

COP:

-0.63

Sortino Ratio

MPC:

-0.24

COP:

-0.79

Omega Ratio

MPC:

0.97

COP:

0.91

Calmar Ratio

MPC:

-0.25

COP:

-0.53

Martin Ratio

MPC:

-0.47

COP:

-1.05

Ulcer Index

MPC:

19.44%

COP:

13.60%

Daily Std Dev

MPC:

29.47%

COP:

22.58%

Max Drawdown

MPC:

-79.67%

COP:

-70.66%

Current Drawdown

MPC:

-37.41%

COP:

-26.73%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MPC:

$44.35B

COP:

$127.11B

EPS

MPC:

$12.89

COP:

$8.43

PE Ratio

MPC:

10.71

COP:

11.66

PEG Ratio

MPC:

15.65

COP:

8.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

MPC:

$142.17B

COP:

$55.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MPC:

$11.45B

COP:

$17.32B

EBITDA (TTM)

MPC:

$10.68B

COP:

$25.18B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPC achieves a -7.11% return, which is significantly higher than COP's -15.11% return. Over the past 10 years, MPC has outperformed COP with an annualized return of 15.58%, while COP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.42% annualized return.


MPC

YTD

-7.11%

1M

-15.06%

6M

-20.85%

1Y

-10.38%

5Y*

21.00%

10Y*

15.58%

COP

YTD

-15.11%

1M

-15.74%

6M

-11.14%

1Y

-15.41%

5Y*

12.63%

10Y*

6.42%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MPC vs. COP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MPC, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.31-0.63
The chart of Sortino ratio for MPC, currently valued at -0.24, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.24-0.79
The chart of Omega ratio for MPC, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.970.91
The chart of Calmar ratio for MPC, currently valued at -0.25, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.25-0.53
The chart of Martin ratio for MPC, currently valued at -0.47, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.00-0.47-1.05
MPC
COP

The current MPC Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is higher than the COP Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPC and COP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.31
-0.63
MPC
COP

Dividends

MPC vs. COP - Dividend Comparison

MPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than COP's 3.26% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
MPC
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
2.51%2.07%2.14%3.63%5.61%3.52%3.12%2.30%2.70%2.20%2.04%1.68%
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
3.26%3.37%4.20%2.70%4.23%2.05%1.86%1.93%1.99%6.30%4.11%3.82%

Drawdowns

MPC vs. COP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPC drawdown since its inception was -79.67%, which is greater than COP's maximum drawdown of -70.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPC and COP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-37.41%
-26.73%
MPC
COP

Volatility

MPC vs. COP - Volatility Comparison

Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) has a higher volatility of 7.67% compared to ConocoPhillips Company (COP) at 6.58%. This indicates that MPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
7.67%
6.58%
MPC
COP

Financials

MPC vs. COP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marathon Petroleum Corporation and ConocoPhillips Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab