PortfoliosLab logo
MPC vs. COP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MPC and COP is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MPC vs. COP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MPC:

-0.13

COP:

-0.65

Sortino Ratio

MPC:

0.09

COP:

-0.78

Omega Ratio

MPC:

1.01

COP:

0.89

Calmar Ratio

MPC:

-0.09

COP:

-0.60

Martin Ratio

MPC:

-0.27

COP:

-1.49

Ulcer Index

MPC:

14.86%

COP:

14.81%

Daily Std Dev

MPC:

36.09%

COP:

32.68%

Max Drawdown

MPC:

-79.67%

COP:

-70.66%

Current Drawdown

MPC:

-23.51%

COP:

-29.01%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MPC:

$50.78B

COP:

$117.35B

EPS

MPC:

$7.26

COP:

$7.89

PE Ratio

MPC:

22.77

COP:

11.78

PEG Ratio

MPC:

2.81

COP:

8.24

PS Ratio

MPC:

0.37

COP:

1.99

PB Ratio

MPC:

3.10

COP:

1.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

MPC:

$138.01B

COP:

$58.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MPC:

$8.37B

COP:

$23.47B

EBITDA (TTM)

MPC:

$9.04B

COP:

$25.52B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPC achieves a 18.33% return, which is significantly higher than COP's -6.04% return. Over the past 10 years, MPC has outperformed COP with an annualized return of 15.73%, while COP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.87% annualized return.


MPC

YTD

18.33%

1M

32.28%

6M

5.39%

1Y

-4.55%

5Y*

44.91%

10Y*

15.73%

COP

YTD

-6.04%

1M

7.03%

6M

-17.04%

1Y

-21.28%

5Y*

21.87%

10Y*

6.87%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MPC vs. COP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MPC is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MPC is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MPC is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MPC is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MPC is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MPC is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

COP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COP is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COP is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COP is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COP is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COP is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COP is 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MPC vs. COP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MPC Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is higher than the COP Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPC and COP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MPC vs. COP - Dividend Comparison

MPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than COP's 2.32% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MPC
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
1.61%2.43%2.07%2.14%3.63%5.61%3.52%3.12%2.30%2.70%2.20%2.04%
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
2.32%2.54%3.37%4.20%2.70%4.23%2.05%1.86%1.93%1.99%6.30%4.11%

Drawdowns

MPC vs. COP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPC drawdown since its inception was -79.67%, which is greater than COP's maximum drawdown of -70.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPC and COP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MPC vs. COP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) is 7.36%, while ConocoPhillips Company (COP) has a volatility of 9.14%. This indicates that MPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

MPC vs. COP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marathon Petroleum Corporation and ConocoPhillips Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20212022202320242025
31.85B
17.10B
(MPC) Total Revenue
(COP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MPC vs. COP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Marathon Petroleum Corporation and ConocoPhillips Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
4.3%
63.8%
(MPC) Gross Margin
(COP) Gross Margin
MPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 31.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.3%.

COP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 10.91B and revenue of 17.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.8%.

MPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported an operating income of 687.00M and revenue of 31.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.

COP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 8.41B and revenue of 17.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.2%.

MPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported a net income of -74.00M and revenue of 31.85B, resulting in a net margin of -0.2%.

COP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 2.85B and revenue of 17.10B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.