HODU vs. TMF
HODU (Direxion Daily HOOD Bull 2X ETF) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HODU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). HODU is actively managed, while TMF is passively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HODU charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.
Performance
HODU vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HODU achieves a -47.69% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's 0.08% return.
HODU
- 1D
- -11.70%
- 1M
- 62.34%
- YTD
- -47.69%
- 6M
- -54.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMF
- 1D
- 3.90%
- 1M
- 10.18%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 6M
- -2.86%
- 1Y
- -0.04%
- 3Y*
- -19.78%
- 5Y*
- -30.25%
- 10Y*
- -16.47%
HODU vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HODU Direxion Daily HOOD Bull 2X ETF | -47.69% | -9.99% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 0.08% | -5.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between HODU and TMF is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HODU vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
HODU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TMF
HODU vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily HOOD Bull 2X ETF (HODU) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HODU | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.02 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.00 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HODU vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HODU drawdown since its inception was -81.62%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HODU and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HODU | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.62% | -92.89% | +11.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -56.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -88.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.53% | -91.71% | +26.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.89% | -43.78% | -13.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.28% | — |
Volatility
HODU vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HODU | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 146.53% | 28.15% | +118.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 146.53% | 46.63% | +99.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 146.53% | 43.87% | +102.66% |
HODU vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
HODU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
HODU vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
HODU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than TMF's 3.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HODU Direxion Daily HOOD Bull 2X ETF | 1.69% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 3.95% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HODU and TMF have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HODU is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HODU is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 1.69% for HODU.
HODU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HODU and 1.01% for TMF.
Find the right allocation for HODU and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer