PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HOBIX vs. RCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HOBIX vs. RCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Holbrook Income Fund Class I (HOBIX) and PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOBIX achieves a 2.22% return, which is significantly higher than RCS's -2.40% return.


HOBIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.38%
YTD
2.22%
6M
3.19%
1Y
6.28%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
4.26%
10Y*

RCS

1D
-1.14%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
-2.40%
6M
-14.12%
1Y
-18.77%
3Y*
8.58%
5Y*
1.32%
10Y*
3.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOBIX vs. RCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HOBIX
Holbrook Income Fund Class I
2.22%7.67%7.66%5.65%-2.91%6.13%7.45%7.70%1.74%2.75%
RCS
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund
-2.40%-21.48%37.47%37.60%-18.72%6.33%-16.19%1.62%15.51%14.39%

Correlation

The correlation between HOBIX and RCS is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HOBIX vs. RCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOBIX
HOBIX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
HOBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
HOBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

RCS
RCS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
RCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
RCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOBIX vs. RCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Holbrook Income Fund Class I (HOBIX) and PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HOBIXRCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+10.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.27

0.87

+3.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.16

-0.57

+12.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

41.27

-0.96

+42.23

HOBIX vs. RCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOBIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.08, which is higher than the RCS Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOBIX and RCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HOBIX vs. RCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOBIX drawdown since its inception was -23.52%, smaller than the maximum RCS drawdown of -46.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOBIX and RCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HOBIXRCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.52%

-46.69%

+23.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.51%

-32.94%

+32.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.77%

-32.94%

+30.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.16%

-36.18%

+32.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-30.38%

+30.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-9.42%

+8.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.15%

19.67%

-19.52%

Volatility

HOBIX vs. RCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Holbrook Income Fund Class I (HOBIX) is 0.54%, while PIMCO Strategic Income Fund (RCS) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that HOBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HOBIXRCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

5.98%

-5.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.51%

19.95%

-18.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02%

23.85%

-21.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.65%

25.20%

-22.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.72%

25.83%

-20.11%

Dividends

HOBIX vs. RCS - Dividend Comparison

HOBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, less than RCS's 9.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HOBIX
Holbrook Income Fund Class I
6.31%6.45%7.04%6.35%5.31%3.97%6.30%3.51%4.32%2.12%0.00%0.00%
RCS
PIMCO Strategic Income Fund
9.21%8.62%8.03%10.07%12.39%9.01%9.57%8.44%8.93%9.50%10.92%11.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


HOBIX and RCS have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RCS has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to HOBIX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOBIX dropped -23.52% vs RCS's -46.69%.

HOBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HOBIX and RCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer