HNSC.L vs. NEE
HNSC.L (HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF USD) is Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq Global Semiconductor, while NEE (NextEra Energy, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, HNSC.L returned 63.81%/yr vs 7.50%/yr for NEE. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HNSC.L vs. NEE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HNSC.L achieves a 98.34% return, which is significantly higher than NEE's 6.07% return.
HNSC.L
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- 30.01%
- YTD
- 98.34%
- 6M
- 101.55%
- 1Y
- 205.51%
- 3Y*
- 63.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEE
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -11.44%
- YTD
- 6.07%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- 1Y
- 21.77%
- 3Y*
- 7.50%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
HNSC.L vs. NEE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HNSC.L HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF USD | 98.34% | 55.83% | 17.71% | 50.92% | -18.53% |
NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | 6.07% | 15.47% | 21.46% | -25.30% | 12.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between HNSC.L and NEE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2022 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HNSC.L vs. NEE — Risk / Return Rank
HNSC.L
NEE
HNSC.L vs. NEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF USD (HNSC.L) and NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HNSC.L | NEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | 1.18 | +0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.62 | 1.51 | +12.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 49.03 | 4.52 | +44.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HNSC.L | NEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.16 | 0.92 | +5.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.66 | 0.61 | +1.04 |
Drawdowns
HNSC.L vs. NEE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HNSC.L drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, smaller than the maximum NEE drawdown of -47.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNSC.L and NEE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HNSC.L | NEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.32% | -47.81% | +8.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.99% | -14.53% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.21% | -34.57% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -13.59% | +13.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.52% | -8.92% | -0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 4.83% | -0.66% |
Volatility
HNSC.L vs. NEE - Volatility Comparison
HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF USD (HNSC.L) has a higher volatility of 14.12% compared to NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) at 8.31%. This indicates that HNSC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HNSC.L | NEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.12% | 8.31% | +5.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.99% | 17.03% | +8.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.21% | 23.81% | +9.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.72% | 26.90% | +10.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.72% | 25.48% | +12.24% |
Dividends
HNSC.L vs. NEE - Dividend Comparison
HNSC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HNSC.L HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NEE NextEra Energy, Inc. | 2.08% | 2.82% | 2.87% | 3.08% | 2.03% | 1.65% | 1.81% | 2.06% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 2.91% | 2.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HNSC.L and NEE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for HNSC.L and NEE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer