PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HNDL vs. EAOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HNDL vs. EAOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF (HNDL) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HNDL vs. EAOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HNDL
Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF
1.31%10.76%10.66%13.28%-19.12%9.06%9.12%
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
-0.60%12.90%7.29%11.83%-15.48%6.39%10.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HNDL achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly higher than EAOM's -0.60% return.


HNDL

1D
0.37%
1M
-3.40%
YTD
1.31%
6M
1.45%
1Y
11.56%
3Y*
10.19%
5Y*
4.55%
10Y*

EAOM

1D
0.38%
1M
-2.76%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
0.88%
1Y
10.92%
3Y*
8.70%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HNDL vs. EAOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HNDL has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOM's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HNDL vs. EAOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HNDL
HNDL Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HNDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HNDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
HNDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
HNDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HNDL Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOM
EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HNDL vs. EAOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF (HNDL) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HNDLEAOMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.97

1.37

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

1.99

-0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.28

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

1.99

-0.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.74

8.33

-1.60

HNDL vs. EAOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HNDL Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the EAOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HNDL and EAOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HNDLEAOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

1.37

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.46

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.65

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between HNDL and EAOM is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HNDL vs. EAOM - Dividend Comparison

HNDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.98%, more than EAOM's 2.91% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HNDL
Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF
6.98%6.86%7.02%6.78%7.87%6.86%6.21%5.27%6.42%
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
2.91%2.89%2.89%2.70%1.93%1.32%1.02%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HNDL vs. EAOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HNDL drawdown since its inception was -23.72%, which is greater than EAOM's maximum drawdown of -20.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNDL and EAOM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HNDLEAOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.72%

-20.73%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.00%

-5.67%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.72%

-20.73%

-2.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-3.31%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-5.09%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.35%

+0.36%

Volatility

HNDL vs. EAOM - Volatility Comparison

Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF (HNDL) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) at 3.27%. This indicates that HNDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HNDLEAOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

3.27%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.59%

4.82%

+0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.02%

8.04%

+3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.49%

8.01%

+3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.80%

7.91%

+2.89%