PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HNDL vs. CEFS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HNDL and CEFS is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

HNDL vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF (HNDL) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%100.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
38.54%
90.22%
HNDL
CEFS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HNDL:

1.33

CEFS:

2.37

Sortino Ratio

HNDL:

1.82

CEFS:

3.19

Omega Ratio

HNDL:

1.23

CEFS:

1.41

Calmar Ratio

HNDL:

1.19

CEFS:

4.25

Martin Ratio

HNDL:

7.72

CEFS:

13.95

Ulcer Index

HNDL:

1.50%

CEFS:

1.81%

Daily Std Dev

HNDL:

8.67%

CEFS:

10.66%

Max Drawdown

HNDL:

-23.72%

CEFS:

-38.99%

Current Drawdown

HNDL:

-4.04%

CEFS:

-3.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HNDL achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly lower than CEFS's 23.19% return.


HNDL

YTD

10.87%

1M

-1.31%

6M

4.75%

1Y

11.30%

5Y*

4.55%

10Y*

N/A

CEFS

YTD

23.19%

1M

-0.74%

6M

7.51%

1Y

24.50%

5Y*

11.23%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HNDL vs. CEFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HNDL has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFS's 3.80% expense ratio.


CEFS
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF
Expense ratio chart for CEFS: current value at 3.80% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%3.80%
Expense ratio chart for HNDL: current value at 0.97% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.97%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HNDL vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF (HNDL) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HNDL, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.332.37
The chart of Sortino ratio for HNDL, currently valued at 1.82, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.001.823.19
The chart of Omega ratio for HNDL, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.231.41
The chart of Calmar ratio for HNDL, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.194.25
The chart of Martin ratio for HNDL, currently valued at 7.72, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.007.7213.95
HNDL
CEFS

The current HNDL Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the CEFS Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HNDL and CEFS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.504.004.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.33
2.37
HNDL
CEFS

Dividends

HNDL vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison

HNDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, less than CEFS's 7.09% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017
HNDL
Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF
7.01%6.78%7.86%6.86%6.68%6.82%6.91%0.00%
CEFS
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF
7.09%9.20%11.32%10.73%8.61%7.56%9.84%6.28%

Drawdowns

HNDL vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HNDL drawdown since its inception was -23.72%, smaller than the maximum CEFS drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNDL and CEFS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-4.04%
-3.85%
HNDL
CEFS

Volatility

HNDL vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison

Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF (HNDL) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) at 2.66%. This indicates that HNDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
3.05%
2.66%
HNDL
CEFS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab