HNASX vs. HOIBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) and Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund (HOIBX).
HNASX is managed by Homestead. It was launched on Jan 22, 2001. HOIBX is managed by Homestead. It was launched on May 1, 2019.
Performance
HNASX vs. HOIBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HNASX vs. HOIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HNASX Homestead Growth Fund | -15.41% | 16.97% | 30.93% | 47.78% | -33.56% | 16.94% | 38.72% | 10.67% |
HOIBX Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.49% | 6.55% | 1.69% | 5.75% | -13.38% | -1.13% | 8.70% | 4.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HNASX achieves a -15.41% return, which is significantly lower than HOIBX's -0.49% return.
HNASX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -9.45%
- YTD
- -15.41%
- 6M
- -14.24%
- 1Y
- 7.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- 14.99%
HOIBX
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 3.30%
- 5Y*
- 0.13%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HNASX vs. HOIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HNASX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than HOIBX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HNASX vs. HOIBX — Risk / Return Rank
HNASX
HOIBX
HNASX vs. HOIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) and Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund (HOIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HNASX | HOIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.33 | 0.90 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.63 | 1.29 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.16 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | 1.49 | -1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.78 | 4.36 | -3.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HNASX | HOIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 0.90 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.02 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between HNASX and HOIBX is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HNASX vs. HOIBX - Dividend Comparison
HNASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.10%, more than HOIBX's 3.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HNASX Homestead Growth Fund | 18.10% | 15.31% | 6.29% | 2.57% | 6.80% | 9.12% | 4.73% | 5.35% | 10.41% | 6.41% | 1.54% | 6.52% |
HOIBX Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.39% | 3.68% | 3.68% | 2.67% | 2.15% | 1.30% | 3.02% | 2.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HNASX vs. HOIBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HNASX drawdown since its inception was -72.74%, which is greater than HOIBX's maximum drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HNASX and HOIBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HNASX | HOIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.74% | -18.15% | -54.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.90% | -2.98% | -15.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.22% | -18.15% | -19.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.90% | -2.75% | -16.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.81% | -6.01% | -18.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.60% | 1.02% | +4.58% |
Volatility
HNASX vs. HOIBX - Volatility Comparison
Homestead Growth Fund (HNASX) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to Homestead Intermediate Bond Fund (HOIBX) at 1.65%. This indicates that HNASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HNASX | HOIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | 1.65% | +4.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.75% | 2.69% | +10.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.36% | 4.47% | +17.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.26% | 5.89% | +16.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 5.57% | +16.16% |