PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMYY vs. TSLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMYY vs. TSLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF (HMYY) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMYY achieves a -43.02% return, which is significantly lower than TSLR's -20.05% return.


HMYY

1D
0.07%
1M
0.34%
YTD
-43.02%
6M
-51.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLR

1D
-0.17%
1M
13.88%
YTD
-20.05%
6M
-20.52%
1Y
8.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMYY vs. TSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HMYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF
-43.02%-14.43%
TSLR
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF
-20.05%7.67%

Correlation

The correlation between HMYY and TSLR is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMYY vs. TSLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMYY

TSLR
TSLR Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMYY vs. TSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF (HMYY) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HMYY vs. TSLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMYYTSLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-2.36

0.00

-2.36

Drawdowns

HMYY vs. TSLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMYY drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, smaller than the maximum TSLR drawdown of -82.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMYY and TSLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMYYTSLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.88%

-82.80%

+25.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.37%

-59.09%

+4.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.77%

-50.24%

+9.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.45%

Volatility

HMYY vs. TSLR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMYYTSLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.67%

92.75%

-60.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.67%

115.54%

-82.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.67%

115.54%

-82.87%

HMYY vs. TSLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLR's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HMYY vs. TSLR - Dividend Comparison

HMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 103.13%, while TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
HMYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF
103.13%12.86%
TSLR
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMYY and TSLR have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HMYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HMYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.

HMYY has the higher dividend yield at 103.13%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.

HMYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSLR is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for HMYY and 1.50% for TSLR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMYY and TSLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer