HMYY vs. TSLR
HMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF) and TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HMYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSLR is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for TSLR.
Performance
HMYY vs. TSLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMYY achieves a -43.02% return, which is significantly lower than TSLR's -20.05% return.
HMYY
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- -43.02%
- 6M
- -51.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLR
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 13.88%
- YTD
- -20.05%
- 6M
- -20.52%
- 1Y
- 8.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HMYY vs. TSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF | -43.02% | -14.43% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | -20.05% | 7.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMYY and TSLR is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMYY vs. TSLR — Risk / Return Rank
HMYY
TSLR
HMYY vs. TSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF (HMYY) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMYY | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -2.36 | 0.00 | -2.36 |
Drawdowns
HMYY vs. TSLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMYY drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, smaller than the maximum TSLR drawdown of -82.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMYY and TSLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMYY | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.88% | -82.80% | +25.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -54.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.37% | -59.09% | +4.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.77% | -50.24% | +9.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 26.45% | — |
Volatility
HMYY vs. TSLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMYY | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 24.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 54.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.67% | 92.75% | -60.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.67% | 115.54% | -82.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.67% | 115.54% | -82.87% |
HMYY vs. TSLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLR's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMYY vs. TSLR - Dividend Comparison
HMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 103.13%, while TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF | 103.13% | 12.86% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMYY and TSLR have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.
HMYY has the higher dividend yield at 103.13%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.
HMYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSLR is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for HMYY and 1.50% for TSLR.
Find the right allocation for HMYY and TSLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer