HMYY vs. LQTI

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

HMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.

Performance

HMYY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF (HMYY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMYY achieves a -40.36% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's -0.81% return.

HMYY

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 2.55%
• 6M: -39.25%
• YTD: -40.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -1.23%
• 6M: -0.95%
• YTD: -0.81%
• 1Y: 3.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMYY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF	-40.36%	-16.23%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	-0.81%	0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between HMYY and LQTI is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025	0.13

Return for Risk

HMYY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 24
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 20
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMYY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF (HMYY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HMYY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.68	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.00	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.12	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.03	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.96	—

Drawdowns

HMYY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMYY drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMYY and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	HMYY	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.88%	-3.41%	-53.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.24%	-2.40%	-49.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.56%	-0.91%	-41.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.18%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HMYY	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.13%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.50%	5.14%	+25.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.50%	5.93%	+24.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.50%	5.93%	+24.57%

HMYY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

HMYY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

HMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 117.56%, more than LQTI's 9.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF	117.56%	12.86%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.25%	7.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HMYY and LQTI in my portfolio?

HMYY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HMYY or LQTI?

On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HMYY or LQTI?

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for HMYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HMYY or LQTI?

HMYY has the higher dividend yield at 117.56%, compared with 9.25% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between HMYY and LQTI?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for HMYY and 0.65% for LQTI.