HMYY vs. NVDL
HMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF) and NVDL (GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HMYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while NVDL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NVDL.
Performance
HMYY vs. NVDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMYY achieves a -39.98% return, which is significantly lower than NVDL's 2.41% return.
HMYY
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 8.23%
- YTD
- -39.98%
- 6M
- -44.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDL
- 1D
- -8.23%
- 1M
- -15.60%
- YTD
- 2.41%
- 6M
- -0.74%
- 1Y
- 52.74%
- 3Y*
- 92.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HMYY vs. NVDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF | -39.98% | -16.23% |
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 2.41% | 5.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMYY and NVDL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMYY vs. NVDL — Risk / Return Rank
HMYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NVDL
HMYY vs. NVDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF (HMYY) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HMYY | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.25 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.75 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HMYY vs. NVDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMYY drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, smaller than the maximum NVDL drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMYY and NVDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMYY | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.88% | -67.55% | +10.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -42.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -67.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.93% | -30.16% | -21.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.73% | -17.07% | -24.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 19.22% | — |
Volatility
HMYY vs. NVDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMYY | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 26.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 53.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.66% | 70.66% | -39.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.66% | 90.42% | -58.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.66% | 90.42% | -58.76% |
HMYY vs. NVDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDL's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMYY vs. NVDL - Dividend Comparison
HMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 106.88%, while NVDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF | 106.88% | 12.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMYY and NVDL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDL is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDL is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for HMYY.
HMYY has the higher dividend yield at 106.88%, compared with 0.00% for NVDL.
HMYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while NVDL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for HMYY and 1.05% for NVDL.
Find the right allocation for HMYY and NVDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer