HMYY vs. NVD
HMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF) and NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HMYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while NVD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. HMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for NVD.
Performance
HMYY vs. NVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMYY achieves a -39.75% return, which is significantly lower than NVD's -33.57% return.
HMYY
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- 6M
- -36.59%
- YTD
- -39.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVD
- 1D
- 4.40%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- 6M
- -33.00%
- YTD
- -33.57%
- 1Y
- -49.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HMYY vs. NVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF | -39.75% | -16.23% |
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | -33.57% | -8.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMYY and NVD is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMYY vs. NVD — Risk / Return Rank
HMYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NVD
HMYY vs. NVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF (HMYY) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HMYY | NVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.91 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.53 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HMYY vs. NVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMYY drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, smaller than the maximum NVD drawdown of -99.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMYY and NVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMYY | NVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.88% | -99.26% | +42.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -60.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.76% | -99.11% | +47.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.73% | -82.23% | +39.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 32.69% | — |
Volatility
HMYY vs. NVD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMYY | NVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 22.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 56.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.46% | 71.85% | -41.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.46% | 92.20% | -61.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.46% | 92.20% | -61.74% |
HMYY vs. NVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than NVD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMYY vs. NVD - Dividend Comparison
HMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 116.38%, more than NVD's 17.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF | 116.38% | 12.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | 17.80% | 11.83% | 8.68% | 15.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMYY and NVD have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.
HMYY has the higher dividend yield at 116.38%, compared with 17.80% for NVD.
HMYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while NVD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for HMYY and 1.50% for NVD.
Find the right allocation for HMYY and NVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer