HMYY vs. IPDP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. HMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.

Performance

HMYY vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF (HMYY) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HMYY

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: -42.94%
• 6M: -51.67%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPDP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMYY vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
HMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF	-23.20%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

HMYY vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF (HMYY) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HMYY	IPDP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-2.36	—	—

Drawdowns

HMYY vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMYY drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMYY and IPDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	HMYY	IPDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.88%	0.00%	-56.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.31%	0.00%	-54.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.88%	0.00%	-40.88%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HMYY	IPDP	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.55%	0.00%	+32.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.55%	0.00%	+32.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.55%	0.00%	+32.55%

HMYY vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

HMYY vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

HMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 102.98%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
HMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF	102.98%	12.86%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, HMYY or IPDP?

On fees, HMYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HMYY or IPDP?

HMYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HMYY or IPDP?

HMYY has the higher dividend yield at 102.98%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between HMYY and IPDP?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for HMYY and 1.52% for IPDP.