HMYY vs. EIPI
HMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF) and EIPI (FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.19 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. HMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for EIPI.
Performance
HMYY vs. EIPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMYY achieves a -42.42% return, which is significantly lower than EIPI's 17.27% return.
HMYY
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- 6M
- -29.83%
- YTD
- -42.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
EIPI
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- YTD
- 17.27%
- 1Y
- 21.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.90M | $2.89M | $2.19M | |
| $25.83K | $28.94K | $30.21K |
HMYY vs. EIPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF | -42.42% | -16.23% |
EIPI FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF | 17.27% | -1.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMYY and EIPI is -0.19, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMYY vs. EIPI — Risk / Return Rank
HMYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EIPI
HMYY vs. EIPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF (HMYY) and FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HMYY | EIPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HMYY vs. EIPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMYY drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, which is greater than EIPI's maximum drawdown of -12.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMYY and EIPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMYY | EIPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.88% | -12.33% | -44.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.89% | -1.06% | -52.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.43% | -1.70% | -41.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility
HMYY vs. EIPI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMYY | EIPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.78% | 10.11% | +19.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.78% | 13.01% | +16.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.78% | 13.01% | +16.77% |
HMYY vs. EIPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPI's 1.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMYY vs. EIPI - Dividend Comparison
HMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 132.47%, more than EIPI's 6.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EIPI FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF | 6.70% | 9.71% | 6.31% |
HMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST HIMS ETF | 132.47% | 12.86% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMYY and EIPI have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for EIPI.
HMYY has the higher dividend yield at 132.47%, compared with 6.70% for EIPI.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for HMYY and 1.11% for EIPI.
Find the right allocation for HMYY and EIPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer