PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMOP vs. CGMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HMOP vs. CGMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HMOP vs. CGMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HMOP
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF
-0.10%4.70%2.52%6.83%4.74%
CGMU
Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
-0.02%5.19%2.64%6.76%4.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMOP achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than CGMU's -0.02% return.


HMOP

1D
0.18%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
1.17%
1Y
4.35%
3Y*
3.81%
5Y*
1.32%
10Y*

CGMU

1D
0.11%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
1.20%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
3.94%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HMOP vs. CGMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

HMOP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CGMU's 0.27% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HMOP vs. CGMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMOP
HMOP Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
HMOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMOP Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
HMOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMOP Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

CGMU
CGMU Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CGMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGMU Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CGMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGMU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMOP vs. CGMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMOPCGMUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

1.45

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.53

1.86

-0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

1.73

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.83

5.83

-1.00

HMOP vs. CGMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMOP Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the CGMU Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMOP and CGMU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMOPCGMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.45

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

1.60

-0.99

Correlation

The correlation between HMOP and CGMU is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HMOP vs. CGMU - Dividend Comparison

HMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than CGMU's 3.38% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HMOP
Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF
3.51%3.40%3.22%2.92%2.12%1.67%5.26%2.87%2.27%
CGMU
Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
3.38%3.32%3.21%3.08%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HMOP vs. CGMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMOP drawdown since its inception was -13.12%, which is greater than CGMU's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMOP and CGMU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HMOPCGMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.12%

-4.11%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-2.86%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-2.27%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.49%

-0.81%

-1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.85%

+0.09%

Volatility

HMOP vs. CGMU - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Municipal Opportunities ETF (HMOP) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) have volatilities of 1.08% and 1.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HMOPCGMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

1.11%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.78%

1.70%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.73%

3.27%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.85%

3.53%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.29%

3.53%

+0.76%