PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMN vs. LESL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HMN vs. LESL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN) and Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMN achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than LESL's 183.03% return.


HMN

1D
-1.67%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
-1.07%
6M
3.11%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
17.48%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
6.30%

LESL

1D
18.23%
1M
199.36%
YTD
183.03%
6M
65.02%
1Y
-70.64%
3Y*
-71.66%
5Y*
-62.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMN vs. LESL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HMN
Horace Mann Educators Corporation
-1.07%21.51%24.62%-8.77%-0.07%-5.03%23.35%
LESL
Leslie's, Inc.
183.03%-96.30%-67.73%-43.41%-48.39%-14.74%27.88%

Correlation

The correlation between HMN and LESL is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020

0.13

The correlation between HMN and LESL shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HMN:

$1.87B

LESL:

$43.56M

EPS

HMN:

$3.98

LESL:

-$29.76

PS Ratio

HMN:

1.13

LESL:

0.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

HMN:

$1.66B

LESL:

$1.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HMN:

$869.90M

LESL:

$428.40M

EBITDA (TTM)

HMN:

$201.30M

LESL:

-$176.53M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMN vs. LESL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMN
HMN Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
HMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMN Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

LESL
LESL Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
LESL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LESL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LESL Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LESL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
LESL Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMN vs. LESL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN) and Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMNLESLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.01

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

-0.75

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.45

-0.93

+2.38

HMN vs. LESL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMN Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the LESL Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMN and LESL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMNLESLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

-0.37

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

-0.58

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

-0.54

+0.76

Drawdowns

HMN vs. LESL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMN drawdown since its inception was -81.68%, smaller than the maximum LESL drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMN and LESL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMNLESLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.68%

-99.85%

+18.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.73%

-94.21%

+83.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.14%

-99.58%

+82.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.09%

-99.85%

+68.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.93%

-99.25%

+94.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.45%

-65.39%

+40.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.13%

76.14%

-71.01%

Volatility

HMN vs. LESL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN) is 5.75%, while Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) has a volatility of 98.93%. This indicates that HMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LESL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMNLESLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

98.93%

-93.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.09%

129.18%

-115.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.15%

190.67%

-170.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.07%

106.69%

-82.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.30%

102.46%

-75.16%

Dividends

HMN vs. LESL - Dividend Comparison

HMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, while LESL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMN
Horace Mann Educators Corporation
3.11%3.03%3.47%4.04%3.43%3.20%2.85%2.63%3.04%2.49%2.48%3.01%
LESL
Leslie's, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HMN vs. LESL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Horace Mann Educators Corporation and Leslie's, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M20222023202420252026
429.30M
184.74M
(HMN) Total Revenue
(LESL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HMN vs. LESL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Horace Mann Educators Corporation and Leslie's, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
28.9%
Portfolio components
HMN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Horace Mann Educators Corporation reported a gross profit of 429.30M and revenue of 429.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

LESL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leslie's, Inc. reported a gross profit of 53.35M and revenue of 184.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.9%.

HMN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Horace Mann Educators Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 429.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

LESL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leslie's, Inc. reported an operating income of -38.86M and revenue of 184.74M, resulting in an operating margin of -21.0%.

HMN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Horace Mann Educators Corporation reported a net income of 41.20M and revenue of 429.30M, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.

LESL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leslie's, Inc. reported a net income of -52.50M and revenue of 184.74M, resulting in a net margin of -28.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HMN and LESL have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LESL has higher volatility (98.93%) compared to HMN (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMN dropped -81.68% vs LESL's -99.85%.

HMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMN and LESL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer