HMN vs. DBMF
HMN (Horace Mann Educators Corporation) is a stock, while DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) is Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iMGP. Over the past 5 years, HMN returned 9.69%/yr vs 8.42%/yr for DBMF. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
HMN vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMN achieves a 13.99% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's 10.15% return.
HMN
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- 6M
- 17.29%
- YTD
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 29.49%
- 3Y*
- 26.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- 7.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.85%
DBMF
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 1Y
- 27.24%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $76.65M | $57.85M | $54.28M | |
| $12.09M | $13.19M | $12.99M |
HMN vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMN Horace Mann Educators Corporation | 13.99% | 21.51% | 24.62% | -8.77% | -0.07% | -5.03% | -0.63% | 11.28% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 10.15% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 11.49% | 1.80% | 10.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMN and DBMF is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.08 |
The correlation between HMN and DBMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMN vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank
HMN
DBMF
HMN vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HMN | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.44 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 4.49 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.99 | 15.18 | -9.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HMN vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMN drawdown since its inception was -81.68%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMN and DBMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMN | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.68% | -20.39% | -61.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.73% | -6.10% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.14% | -15.60% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.09% | -20.39% | -10.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.27% | -2.73% | -1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.34% | -6.47% | -17.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.94% | 1.80% | +3.14% |
Volatility
HMN vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison
Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.43%. This indicates that HMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMN | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 2.43% | +2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.55% | 9.25% | +5.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.98% | 12.72% | +7.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.02% | 12.45% | +11.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.31% | 12.36% | +14.95% |
Dividends
HMN vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison
HMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than DBMF's 5.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.16% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HMN Horace Mann Educators Corporation | 2.74% | 3.03% | 3.47% | 4.04% | 3.43% | 3.20% | 2.85% | 2.63% | 3.04% | 2.49% | 2.48% | 3.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMN and DBMF have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HMN has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to DBMF (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HMN dropped -81.68% vs DBMF's -20.39%.
DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HMN and DBMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer