PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HMEU.L vs. ABT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HMEU.L vs. ABT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (HMEU.L) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HMEU.L is traded in GBp, while ABT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ABT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HMEU.L achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly higher than ABT's -26.42% return. Over the past 10 years, HMEU.L has underperformed ABT with an annualized return of 10.50%, while ABT has yielded a comparatively higher 11.65% annualized return.


HMEU.L

1D
0.61%
1M
3.46%
YTD
6.73%
6M
8.70%
1Y
19.15%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
10.50%

ABT

1D
4.36%
1M
6.55%
YTD
-26.42%
6M
-27.08%
1Y
-30.05%
3Y*
-4.87%
5Y*
-0.76%
10Y*
11.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HMEU.L vs. ABT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HMEU.L
HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF
6.73%25.88%6.23%13.28%-3.35%17.08%2.26%19.72%-9.45%15.34%
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
-26.42%4.83%6.64%-2.85%-11.25%31.76%24.28%17.44%36.71%38.88%

Correlation

The correlation between HMEU.L and ABT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2010

0.27

The correlation between HMEU.L and ABT shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (3 years) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HMEU.L vs. ABT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HMEU.L
HMEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
HMEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
HMEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

ABT
ABT Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ABT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABT Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABT Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ABT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HMEU.L vs. ABT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (HMEU.L) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HMEU.LABTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.78

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

-0.76

+2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.52

-1.81

+8.33

HMEU.L vs. ABT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HMEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the ABT Sharpe Ratio of -1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HMEU.L and ABT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HMEU.LABTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

-1.20

+2.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

-0.04

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.49

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.51

+0.14

Drawdowns

HMEU.L vs. ABT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HMEU.L drawdown since its inception was -28.42%, smaller than the maximum ABT drawdown of -43.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMEU.L and ABT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HMEU.LABTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.42%

-43.66%

+15.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-39.04%

+28.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.77%

-43.66%

+30.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.46%

-43.66%

+28.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.42%

-43.66%

+15.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-37.18%

+35.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-9.19%

+4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

16.37%

-13.44%

Volatility

HMEU.L vs. ABT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF (HMEU.L) is 3.84%, while Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has a volatility of 8.76%. This indicates that HMEU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HMEU.LABTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

8.76%

-4.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.19%

20.11%

-9.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

24.79%

-12.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.81%

21.70%

-7.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.47%

23.99%

-8.52%

Dividends

HMEU.L vs. ABT - Dividend Comparison

HMEU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than ABT's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABT
Abbott Laboratories
2.69%1.88%1.95%1.85%1.71%1.28%1.32%1.47%1.55%1.86%2.71%2.14%
HMEU.L
HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF
2.44%2.55%5.65%2.80%2.85%2.16%2.13%3.10%3.29%2.77%2.82%5.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


HMEU.L and ABT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HMEU.L and ABT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer