HMEF.L vs. DEMS.L
HMEF.L (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD) and DEMS.L (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from HSBC and WisdomTree respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HMEF.L returned 5.72%/yr vs 10.95%/yr for DEMS.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HMEF.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for DEMS.L.
Performance
HMEF.L vs. DEMS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMEF.L achieves a 25.52% return, which is significantly higher than DEMS.L's 18.95% return.
HMEF.L
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 6.53%
- YTD
- 25.52%
- 6M
- 27.29%
- 1Y
- 51.20%
- 3Y*
- 17.76%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
DEMS.L
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 5.82%
- YTD
- 18.95%
- 6M
- 18.43%
- 1Y
- 31.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.95%
- 10Y*
- —
HMEF.L vs. DEMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD | 25.52% | 21.88% | 6.43% | -0.16% | -12.59% | -4.10% | 12.68% | 10.34% | -11.43% | 23.56% |
DEMS.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc | 18.95% | 12.50% | 7.08% | 14.64% | -2.59% | 15.41% | -9.66% | 14.70% | -2.61% | 15.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between HMEF.L and DEMS.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2016 | 0.84 |
The correlation between HMEF.L and DEMS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
HMEF.L vs. DEMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HMEF.L
DEMS.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
HMEF.L
DEMS.L
Financial Services
HMEF.L
DEMS.L
Consumer Cyclical
HMEF.L
DEMS.L
Industrials
HMEF.L
DEMS.L
Communication Services
HMEF.L
DEMS.L
Basic Materials
HMEF.L
DEMS.L
Energy
HMEF.L
DEMS.L
Consumer Defensive
HMEF.L
DEMS.L
Healthcare
HMEF.L
DEMS.L
Utilities
HMEF.L
DEMS.L
Real Estate
HMEF.L
DEMS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HMEF.L vs. DEMS.L — Risk / Return Rank
HMEF.L
DEMS.L
HMEF.L vs. DEMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (DEMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HMEF.L | DEMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.48 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.60 | 4.77 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.90 | 16.97 | -1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HMEF.L | DEMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99 | 2.67 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.86 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.54 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
HMEF.L vs. DEMS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMEF.L drawdown since its inception was -32.91%, which is greater than DEMS.L's maximum drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMEF.L and DEMS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HMEF.L | DEMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.91% | -29.57% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.07% | -6.47% | -4.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.40% | -12.88% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.99% | -14.79% | -12.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.56% | -1.15% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.28% | -5.01% | -7.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 1.82% | +1.39% |
Volatility
HMEF.L vs. DEMS.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (DEMS.L) at 4.53%. This indicates that HMEF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEMS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HMEF.L | DEMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.42% | 4.53% | +2.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.61% | 9.27% | +5.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.04% | 11.58% | +5.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 12.78% | +3.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 15.65% | +2.27% |
HMEF.L vs. DEMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HMEF.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DEMS.L's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
HMEF.L vs. DEMS.L - Dividend Comparison
HMEF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while DEMS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMS.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HMEF.L and DEMS.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMEF.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMEF.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for DEMS.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for HMEF.L and 0.46% for DEMS.L.
Find the right allocation for HMEF.L and DEMS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer