DEMS.L vs. EIMI.L
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (DEMS.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L).
DEMS.L and EIMI.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DEMS.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Nov 2, 2016. EIMI.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. It was launched on May 30, 2014. Both DEMS.L and EIMI.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DEMS.L vs. EIMI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DEMS.L vs. EIMI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMS.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc | 6.91% | 12.50% | 7.08% | 14.64% | -2.59% | 15.41% | -9.66% | 14.70% | -2.61% | 15.25% |
EIMI.L iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF | 4.49% | 22.75% | 9.23% | 5.48% | -10.12% | 0.29% | 15.31% | 11.94% | -9.08% | 25.11% |
Different Trading Currencies
DEMS.L is traded in GBp, while EIMI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EIMI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEMS.L achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly higher than EIMI.L's 6.20% return.
DEMS.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 6.91%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 18.70%
- 3Y*
- 12.82%
- 5Y*
- 9.15%
- 10Y*
- —
EIMI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 6.20%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 31.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DEMS.L vs. EIMI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEMS.L has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than EIMI.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DEMS.L vs. EIMI.L — Risk / Return Rank
DEMS.L
EIMI.L
DEMS.L vs. EIMI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (DEMS.L) and iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEMS.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.43 | 1.80 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 2.36 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.35 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 3.26 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.04 | 11.49 | +0.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEMS.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 1.80 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.35 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.40 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between DEMS.L and EIMI.L is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DEMS.L vs. EIMI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DEMS.L nor EIMI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
DEMS.L vs. EIMI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEMS.L drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, smaller than the maximum EIMI.L drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMS.L and EIMI.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEMS.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.57% | -38.73% | +9.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.23% | -12.66% | +4.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.79% | -35.66% | +20.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.03% | -10.69% | +7.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -14.21% | +9.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 3.35% | -1.54% |
Volatility
DEMS.L vs. EIMI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (DEMS.L) is 4.31%, while iShares Core MSCI EM IMI UCITS ETF (EIMI.L) has a volatility of 7.95%. This indicates that DEMS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIMI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DEMS.L | EIMI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 7.95% | -3.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.72% | 13.28% | -4.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.01% | 17.37% | -4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.81% | 16.12% | -3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.67% | 18.19% | -2.52% |