DEMS.L vs. GGRG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (DEMS.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L).
DEMS.L and GGRG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DEMS.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Nov 2, 2016. GGRG.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. It was launched on Jun 3, 2016. Both DEMS.L and GGRG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DEMS.L or GGRG.L.
Key characteristics
| DEMS.L | GGRG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.95% | 7.50% |
| 1Y Return | 23.01% | 15.69% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.68% | 10.29% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.18% | 12.59% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.90 | 1.64 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.88% | 9.29% |
| Max Drawdown | -29.57% | -22.15% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEMS.L and GGRG.L is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
DEMS.L vs. GGRG.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, DEMS.L achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly higher than GGRG.L's 7.50% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DEMS.L vs. GGRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEMS.L has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than GGRG.L's 0.38% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DEMS.L vs. GGRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (DEMS.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DEMS.L vs. GGRG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DEMS.L nor GGRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
DEMS.L vs. GGRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEMS.L drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, which is greater than GGRG.L's maximum drawdown of -22.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMS.L and GGRG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DEMS.L vs. GGRG.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF Acc (DEMS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L) at 3.77%. This indicates that DEMS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.