HLT vs. CB
HLT (Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.) and CB (Chubb Limited) are both stocks. HLT operates in Lodging (Consumer Cyclical), while CB operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, HLT returned 48.07%/yr vs 12.26%/yr for CB. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HLT vs. CB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLT achieves a 20.95% return, which is significantly higher than CB's 5.39% return. Over the past 10 years, HLT has outperformed CB with an annualized return of 48.07%, while CB has yielded a comparatively lower 12.26% annualized return.
HLT
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 9.84%
- YTD
- 20.95%
- 6M
- 21.54%
- 1Y
- 42.62%
- 3Y*
- 35.44%
- 5Y*
- 22.62%
- 10Y*
- 48.07%
CB
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 5.39%
- 6M
- 5.22%
- 1Y
- 15.46%
- 3Y*
- 20.42%
- 5Y*
- 16.13%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
HLT vs. CB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 20.95% | 16.49% | 36.11% | 44.68% | -18.72% | 40.20% | 0.47% | 55.48% | -9.40% | 829.98% |
CB Chubb Limited | 5.39% | 14.46% | 23.89% | 4.20% | 15.97% | 27.85% | 1.41% | 22.94% | -9.63% | 12.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLT and CB is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013 | 0.35 |
The correlation between HLT and CB shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HLT:
$80.53B
CB:
$129.01B
HLT:
$6.50
CB:
$28.35
HLT:
53.41
CB:
11.53
HLT:
0.86
CB:
0.80
HLT:
6.71
CB:
2.71
HLT:
$12.28B
CB:
$48.15B
HLT:
$5.44B
CB:
$17.01B
HLT:
$3.00B
CB:
$12.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HLT vs. CB — Risk / Return Rank
HLT
CB
HLT vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HLT | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.17 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.16 | 1.66 | +2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 3.77 | +5.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HLT vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLT drawdown since its inception was -50.82%, roughly equal to the maximum CB drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLT and CB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLT | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.82% | -50.99% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | -9.36% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.35% | -14.35% | -12.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.65% | -19.26% | -13.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.82% | -42.59% | -8.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.03% | +4.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.71% | -10.68% | +0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 4.11% | +0.30% |
Volatility
HLT vs. CB - Volatility Comparison
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to Chubb Limited (CB) at 5.99%. This indicates that HLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HLT | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 5.99% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.23% | 12.76% | +4.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.99% | 17.66% | +5.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.07% | 20.33% | +6.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 181.03% | 23.69% | +157.34% |
Dividends
HLT vs. CB - Dividend Comparison
HLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than CB's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CB Chubb Limited | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 1.91% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 4.23% |
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 0.17% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.54% | 0.84% | 31.40% | 1.03% | 0.65% |
Financials
HLT vs. CB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HLT and CB have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HLT has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to CB (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLT dropped -50.82% vs CB's -50.99%.
HLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HLT and CB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer