PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLIT.TO vs. LIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HLIT.TO vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF (HLIT.TO) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HLIT.TO vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HLIT.TO
Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF
9.48%42.90%-43.73%-17.02%-5.87%46.00%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
16.18%52.70%-12.25%-14.11%-24.92%26.66%
Different Trading Currencies

HLIT.TO is traded in CAD, while LIT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LIT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLIT.TO achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's 16.18% return.


HLIT.TO

1D
1.25%
1M
-3.86%
YTD
9.48%
6M
44.95%
1Y
77.65%
3Y*
-12.21%
5Y*
10Y*

LIT

1D
2.42%
1M
0.55%
YTD
16.18%
6M
31.02%
1Y
86.40%
3Y*
7.30%
5Y*
7.44%
10Y*
15.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HLIT.TO vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLIT.TO has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HLIT.TO vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLIT.TO
HLIT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
HLIT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLIT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLIT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HLIT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLIT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

LIT
LIT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLIT.TO vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF (HLIT.TO) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLIT.TOLITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

2.58

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

3.19

-0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.42

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

4.53

-1.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.73

15.16

-6.43

HLIT.TO vs. LIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLIT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the LIT Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLIT.TO and LIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLIT.TOLITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.58

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.34

-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between HLIT.TO and LIT is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HLIT.TO vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

HLIT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than LIT's 0.42% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLIT.TO
Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF
0.11%0.12%2.24%2.58%1.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
0.42%0.49%0.93%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%

Drawdowns

HLIT.TO vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -61.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLIT.TO and LIT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HLIT.TOLITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.20%

-65.91%

-11.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.73%

-17.61%

-6.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.55%

-19.86%

-26.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.68%

-33.90%

-3.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.35%

4.63%

+3.72%

Volatility

HLIT.TO vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF (HLIT.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.79% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 11.90%. This indicates that HLIT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HLIT.TOLITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.79%

11.90%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.37%

24.32%

+5.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.95%

33.70%

+7.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.78%

29.54%

+9.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.78%

28.30%

+10.48%