PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLIT.TO vs. GLDX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HLIT.TO vs. GLDX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF (HLIT.TO) and Global X Gold Producers Index ETF (GLDX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HLIT.TO vs. GLDX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HLIT.TO
Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF
9.48%42.90%-13.30%
GLDX.TO
Global X Gold Producers Index ETF
8.02%178.05%-11.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLIT.TO achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly higher than GLDX.TO's 8.02% return.


HLIT.TO

1D
1.25%
1M
-3.86%
YTD
9.48%
6M
44.95%
1Y
77.65%
3Y*
-12.21%
5Y*
10Y*

GLDX.TO

1D
7.06%
1M
-19.13%
YTD
8.02%
6M
24.46%
1Y
114.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HLIT.TO vs. GLDX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

HLIT.TO vs. GLDX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLIT.TO
HLIT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
HLIT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLIT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLIT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HLIT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLIT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDX.TO
GLDX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GLDX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLIT.TO vs. GLDX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF (HLIT.TO) and Global X Gold Producers Index ETF (GLDX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLIT.TOGLDX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

2.44

-0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

2.59

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.39

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

3.84

-0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.73

13.73

-4.99

HLIT.TO vs. GLDX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLIT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the GLDX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLIT.TO and GLDX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLIT.TOGLDX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.44

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

2.37

-2.37

Correlation

The correlation between HLIT.TO and GLDX.TO is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HLIT.TO vs. GLDX.TO - Dividend Comparison

HLIT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than GLDX.TO's 0.90% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
HLIT.TO
Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF
0.11%0.12%2.24%2.58%1.88%
GLDX.TO
Global X Gold Producers Index ETF
0.90%0.97%0.08%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HLIT.TO vs. GLDX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, which is greater than GLDX.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLIT.TO and GLDX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HLIT.TOGLDX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.20%

-30.14%

-47.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.73%

-30.14%

+6.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.55%

-19.13%

-27.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.68%

-4.99%

-32.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.35%

8.42%

-0.07%

Volatility

HLIT.TO vs. GLDX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF (HLIT.TO) is 13.79%, while Global X Gold Producers Index ETF (GLDX.TO) has a volatility of 18.08%. This indicates that HLIT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HLIT.TOGLDX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.79%

18.08%

-4.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.37%

38.21%

-8.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.95%

46.99%

-6.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.78%

43.32%

-4.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.78%

43.32%

-4.54%