HLIT.TO vs. CPCC.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF (HLIT.TO) and Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (CPCC.TO).

HLIT.TO and CPCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HLIT.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Lithium Producers Index. It was launched on Jun 22, 2021. CPCC.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive North American Listed Copper Producers Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2025. Both HLIT.TO and CPCC.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

HLIT.TO vs. CPCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF (HLIT.TO) and Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (CPCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HLIT.TO vs. CPCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HLIT.TO Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF	9.48%	7.77%
CPCC.TO Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	0.71%	9.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLIT.TO achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly higher than CPCC.TO's 0.71% return.

HLIT.TO

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: -3.86%
• YTD: 9.48%
• 6M: 44.95%
• 1Y: 77.65%
• 3Y*: -12.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CPCC.TO

• 1D: 6.72%
• 1M: -17.90%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLIT.TO vs. CPCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLIT.TO has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than CPCC.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

HLIT.TO

Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF

CPCC.TO

Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF

Return for Risk

HLIT.TO vs. CPCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLIT.TO

HLIT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 84
HLIT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
HLIT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
HLIT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
HLIT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
HLIT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLIT.TO vs. CPCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF (HLIT.TO) and Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (CPCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HLIT.TO	CPCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.73	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HLIT.TO	CPCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	0.84	-0.83

Correlation

The correlation between HLIT.TO and CPCC.TO is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HLIT.TO vs. CPCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HLIT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than CPCC.TO's 1.94% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
HLIT.TO Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF	0.11%	0.12%	2.24%	2.58%	1.88%
CPCC.TO Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	1.94%	0.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HLIT.TO vs. CPCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, which is greater than CPCC.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLIT.TO and CPCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HLIT.TO	CPCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.20%	-27.12%	-50.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.55%	-18.06%	-28.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.68%	-5.88%	-31.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.35%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HLIT.TO	CPCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.79%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.37%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.95%	43.22%	-2.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.78%	43.22%	-4.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.78%	43.22%	-4.44%