HLAL vs. SGRT
HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. HLAL is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HLAL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
HLAL vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLAL achieves a 18.72% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.
HLAL
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 6M
- 17.75%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.04%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- —
SGRT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 56.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HLAL vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 18.72% | 11.68% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 51.46% | 25.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLAL and SGRT is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HLAL vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
HLAL
SGRT
HLAL vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLAL | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.30 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.85 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLAL | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 3.81 | -2.91 |
Drawdowns
HLAL vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLAL drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLAL and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLAL | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.57% | -17.87% | -15.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | 0.00% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | -3.11% | -1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | — | — |
Volatility
HLAL vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HLAL | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 33.41% | -20.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 33.41% | -15.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 33.41% | -13.20% |
HLAL vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
HLAL vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
HLAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HLAL and SGRT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HLAL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HLAL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.
HLAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.
Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HLAL and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for HLAL and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer