HLAL vs. DGRO
HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - HLAL tracks the FTSE Shariah USA Index while DGRO tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HLAL returned 15.86%/yr vs 10.54%/yr for DGRO. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HLAL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
HLAL vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLAL achieves a 18.72% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 8.76% return.
HLAL
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 6M
- 17.75%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.04%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
HLAL vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 18.72% | 18.30% | 16.70% | 30.13% | -17.56% | 28.64% | 24.65% | 10.96% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 8.76% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 9.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLAL and DGRO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.80 |
The correlation between HLAL and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HLAL vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HLAL
DGRO
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
Technology
HLAL
DGRO
Communication Services
HLAL
DGRO
Healthcare
HLAL
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
HLAL
DGRO
Industrials
HLAL
DGRO
Energy
HLAL
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
HLAL
DGRO
Basic Materials
HLAL
DGRO
Utilities
HLAL
DGRO
Real Estate
HLAL
DGRO
-
Financial Services
HLAL
DGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HLAL vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
HLAL
DGRO
HLAL vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLAL | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.43 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.30 | 3.50 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.85 | 13.52 | +6.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLAL | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.33 | 2.39 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.77 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.76 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
HLAL vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLAL drawdown since its inception was -33.57%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLAL and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLAL | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.57% | -35.10% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.20% | -6.47% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.67% | -14.03% | -7.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.18% | -19.31% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -0.28% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | -3.44% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 1.67% | +0.53% |
Volatility
HLAL vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that HLAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HLAL | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 2.21% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 6.91% | +3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 9.48% | +3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 13.82% | +3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 16.62% | +3.59% |
HLAL vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
HLAL vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
HLAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HLAL and DGRO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HLAL has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLAL dropped -33.57% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 5-year performance, HLAL leads with 15.86% vs 10.54% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 10.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HLAL.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.44% for HLAL.
HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Wahed and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HLAL and 0.08% for DGRO.
HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HLAL and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer