HL vs. CIB
HL (Hecla Mining Company) and CIB (Bancolombia S.A.) are both stocks. HL operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while CIB operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, HL returned 13.21%/yr vs 14.75%/yr for CIB. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HL vs. CIB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HL achieves a -22.38% return, which is significantly lower than CIB's 14.89% return. Over the past 10 years, HL has underperformed CIB with an annualized return of 13.21%, while CIB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.75% annualized return.
HL
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -19.97%
- YTD
- -22.38%
- 6M
- -6.02%
- 1Y
- 137.76%
- 3Y*
- 41.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
CIB
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 10.00%
- YTD
- 14.89%
- 6M
- 17.10%
- 1Y
- 69.72%
- 3Y*
- 51.05%
- 5Y*
- 29.38%
- 10Y*
- 14.75%
HL vs. CIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HL Hecla Mining Company | -22.38% | 291.70% | 2.82% | -12.93% | 6.99% | -18.97% | 91.83% | 44.43% | -40.37% | -24.08% |
CIB Bancolombia S.A. | 14.89% | 124.16% | 13.78% | 22.08% | -0.31% | -20.69% | -22.31% | 47.45% | -0.72% | 11.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between HL and CIB is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 1995 | 0.17 |
The correlation between HL and CIB shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.31 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HL:
$10.05B
CIB:
$17.04B
HL:
$0.84
CIB:
$29.17K
HL:
17.71
CIB:
0.00
HL:
0.07
CIB:
0.00
HL:
6.30
CIB:
0.00
HL:
3.91
CIB:
0.00
HL:
$1.57B
CIB:
$43.34T
HL:
$788.95M
CIB:
$25.71T
HL:
$864.40M
CIB:
$10.37T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HL vs. CIB — Risk / Return Rank
HL
CIB
HL vs. CIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hecla Mining Company (HL) and Bancolombia S.A. (CIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HL | CIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.37 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 2.93 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.82 | 7.27 | -1.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HL | CIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 2.20 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.90 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.41 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.25 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
HL vs. CIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HL drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, roughly equal to the maximum CIB drawdown of -93.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL and CIB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HL | CIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.92% | -93.77% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.52% | -23.95% | -29.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.52% | -23.95% | -29.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.18% | -46.85% | -16.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.45% | -70.38% | -12.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.17% | -13.55% | -39.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.95% | -32.62% | -37.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.76% | 9.63% | +14.13% |
Volatility
HL vs. CIB - Volatility Comparison
Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a higher volatility of 24.76% compared to Bancolombia S.A. (CIB) at 12.58%. This indicates that HL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HL | CIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.76% | 12.58% | +12.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.25% | 26.42% | +28.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.35% | 31.85% | +40.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.31% | 32.68% | +26.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.76% | 35.74% | +27.02% |
Dividends
HL vs. CIB - Dividend Comparison
HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than CIB's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIB Bancolombia S.A. | 1.70% | 6.90% | 10.96% | 10.92% | 10.68% | 0.87% | 4.01% | 2.41% | 3.62% | 3.21% | 3.21% | 4.49% |
HL Hecla Mining Company | 0.10% | 0.08% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.25% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.53% |
Financials
HL vs. CIB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hecla Mining Company and Bancolombia S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HL vs. CIB - Profitability Comparison
HL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
CIB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bancolombia S.A. reported a gross profit of 6.19T and revenue of 10.46T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.2%.
HL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.
CIB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bancolombia S.A. reported an operating income of 2.15T and revenue of 10.46T, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.
HL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.
CIB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bancolombia S.A. reported a net income of 1.46T and revenue of 10.46T, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HL and CIB have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HL has higher volatility (24.76%) compared to CIB (12.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HL dropped -97.92% vs CIB's -93.77%.
CIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HL and CIB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer