PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HL vs. ATAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HL vs. ATAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hecla Mining Company (HL) and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HL achieves a -26.39% return, which is significantly lower than ATAT's -11.46% return.


HL

1D
-5.43%
1M
-9.43%
6M
-37.28%
YTD
-26.39%
1Y
146.28%
3Y*
37.43%
5Y*
16.67%
10Y*
8.43%
ALL TIME*
-0.08%

ATAT

1D
0.26%
1M
4.44%
6M
-2.40%
YTD
-11.46%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$28.26M$28.42M$34.53M
$675.62M$596.53M$453.27M

HL vs. ATAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HL
Hecla Mining Company
-26.39%291.70%2.82%-12.93%11.50%
ATAT
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited
-11.46%49.78%58.43%-2.92%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between HL and ATAT is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HL:

$9.47B

ATAT:

$4.74B

EPS

HL:

$0.83

ATAT:

CN¥13.16

PE Ratio

HL:

17.01

ATAT:

17.61

PEG Ratio

HL:

0.07

ATAT:

0.11

PS Ratio

HL:

6.05

ATAT:

3.03

PB Ratio

HL:

3.71

ATAT:

8.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

HL:

$1.57B

ATAT:

CN¥10.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HL:

$788.95M

ATAT:

CN¥4.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

HL:

$864.40M

ATAT:

CN¥2.46B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HL vs. ATAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HL
HL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HL Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HL Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ATAT
ATAT Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ATAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATAT Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
ATAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATAT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HL vs. ATAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hecla Mining Company (HL) and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HLATATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.05

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

0.15

+2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.75

0.31

+4.44

HL vs. ATAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HL Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the ATAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HL and ATAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HL vs. ATAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HL drawdown since its inception was -97.92%, which is greater than ATAT's maximum drawdown of -46.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HL and ATAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLATATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.92%

-46.91%

-51.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.81%

-26.49%

-29.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.81%

-30.96%

-24.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.59%

-18.67%

-36.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.88%

-20.18%

-49.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.92%

13.02%

+17.90%

Volatility

HL vs. ATAT - Volatility Comparison

Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a higher volatility of 17.22% compared to Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT) at 10.43%. This indicates that HL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLATATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.22%

10.43%

+6.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.30%

27.47%

+23.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.85%

38.63%

+35.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.58%

58.26%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.79%

58.26%

+4.53%

Dividends

HL vs. ATAT - Dividend Comparison

HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than ATAT's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATAT
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited
2.62%1.98%1.67%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HL
Hecla Mining Company
0.11%0.08%0.81%0.65%0.40%0.72%0.25%0.29%0.42%0.25%0.19%0.53%

Financials

HL vs. ATAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hecla Mining Company and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

HL vs. ATAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hecla Mining Company and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

HL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.

ATAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 1.16B and revenue of 2.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.4%.

HL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.

ATAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 568.24M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.

HL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.

ATAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported a net income of 460.55M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HL and ATAT have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HL has higher volatility (17.22%) compared to ATAT (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HL dropped -97.92% vs ATAT's -46.91%.

HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HL and ATAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer