PortfoliosLab logo
ATAT vs. MNSO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ATAT and MNSO is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ATAT vs. MNSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT) and MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ATAT:

1.75

MNSO:

-0.36

Sortino Ratio

ATAT:

2.41

MNSO:

-0.09

Omega Ratio

ATAT:

1.29

MNSO:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

ATAT:

1.74

MNSO:

-0.42

Martin Ratio

ATAT:

7.49

MNSO:

-0.97

Ulcer Index

ATAT:

10.58%

MNSO:

25.38%

Daily Std Dev

ATAT:

47.24%

MNSO:

69.04%

Max Drawdown

ATAT:

-46.91%

MNSO:

-86.58%

Current Drawdown

ATAT:

-4.72%

MNSO:

-45.65%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATAT:

$4.41B

MNSO:

$5.37B

EPS

ATAT:

$1.26

MNSO:

$1.09

PE Ratio

ATAT:

25.31

MNSO:

16.07

PS Ratio

ATAT:

0.57

MNSO:

0.30

PB Ratio

ATAT:

9.64

MNSO:

3.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATAT:

$7.86B

MNSO:

$13.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATAT:

$3.36B

MNSO:

$6.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

ATAT:

$1.84B

MNSO:

$2.33B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATAT achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly higher than MNSO's -27.29% return.


ATAT

YTD

16.44%

1M

28.11%

6M

24.49%

1Y

81.75%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MNSO

YTD

-27.29%

1M

-5.60%

6M

-13.19%

1Y

-25.05%

3Y*

50.31%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited

MINISO Group Holding Limited

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ATAT vs. MNSO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ATAT is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ATAT is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ATAT is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ATAT is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ATAT is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ATAT is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

MNSO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MNSO is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MNSO is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MNSO is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MNSO is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MNSO is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MNSO is 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ATAT vs. MNSO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT) and MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ATAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the MNSO Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATAT and MNSO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ATAT vs. MNSO - Dividend Comparison

ATAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than MNSO's 3.53% yield.


TTM2024202320222021
ATAT
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited
1.44%1.67%0.86%0.00%0.00%
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
3.53%2.36%2.02%1.60%1.51%

Drawdowns

ATAT vs. MNSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATAT drawdown since its inception was -46.91%, smaller than the maximum MNSO drawdown of -86.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATAT and MNSO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ATAT vs. MNSO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT) is 13.82%, while MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) has a volatility of 25.26%. This indicates that ATAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ATAT vs. MNSO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited and MINISO Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20212022202320242025
2.08B
4.71B
(ATAT) Total Revenue
(MNSO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items