PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATAT vs. MNSO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATAT vs. MNSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT) and MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATAT achieves a -15.43% return, which is significantly higher than MNSO's -37.63% return.


ATAT

1D
3.08%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
-15.43%
6M
-21.92%
1Y
8.01%
3Y*
30.68%
5Y*
10Y*

MNSO

1D
-1.04%
1M
-15.59%
YTD
-37.63%
6M
-40.27%
1Y
-31.59%
3Y*
-6.68%
5Y*
-8.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATAT vs. MNSO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ATAT
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited
-15.43%49.78%58.43%-2.92%16.26%
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
-37.63%-18.93%20.92%93.11%58.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ATAT and MNSO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022

0.38

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATAT:

$4.54B

MNSO:

$3.50B

EPS

ATAT:

CN¥13.15

MNSO:

CN¥6.65

PE Ratio

ATAT:

16.88

MNSO:

11.61

PEG Ratio

ATAT:

0.10

MNSO:

0.07

PS Ratio

ATAT:

2.91

MNSO:

1.05

PB Ratio

ATAT:

8.36

MNSO:

2.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATAT:

CN¥10.65B

MNSO:

CN¥22.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATAT:

CN¥4.63B

MNSO:

CN¥10.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

ATAT:

CN¥2.46B

MNSO:

CN¥3.73B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATAT vs. MNSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATAT
ATAT Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ATAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATAT Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
ATAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATAT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

MNSO
MNSO Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MNSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNSO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MNSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNSO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATAT vs. MNSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT) and MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATATMNSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.87

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

-0.57

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.75

-1.11

+1.86

ATAT vs. MNSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the MNSO Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATAT and MNSO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATAT vs. MNSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATAT drawdown since its inception was -46.91%, smaller than the maximum MNSO drawdown of -86.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATAT and MNSO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATATMNSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.91%

-86.58%

+39.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.64%

-55.56%

+30.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.96%

-57.92%

+26.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.32%

-62.20%

+39.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.09%

-45.59%

+25.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.65%

28.53%

-17.88%

Volatility

ATAT vs. MNSO - Volatility Comparison

Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT) and MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) have volatilities of 10.56% and 10.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATATMNSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.56%

10.33%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.55%

23.44%

+5.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.97%

39.86%

-1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.82%

67.19%

-8.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.82%

68.50%

-9.68%

Dividends

ATAT vs. MNSO - Dividend Comparison

ATAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than MNSO's 5.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ATAT
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited
2.74%1.98%1.67%0.86%0.00%0.00%
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
5.83%3.29%2.36%2.02%1.60%1.51%

Financials

ATAT vs. MNSO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited and MINISO Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
2.79B
5.65B
(ATAT) Total Revenue
(MNSO) Total Revenue
Values in CNY except per share items

ATAT vs. MNSO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited and MINISO Group Holding Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%20222023202420252026
41.4%
43.3%
Portfolio components
ATAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 1.16B and revenue of 2.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.4%.

MNSO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 2.45B and revenue of 5.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.3%.

ATAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 568.24M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.

MNSO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of 689.46M and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.

ATAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported a net income of 460.55M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.

MNSO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 1.24B and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATAT and MNSO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATAT has higher volatility (10.56%) compared to MNSO (10.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATAT dropped -46.91% vs MNSO's -86.58%.

ATAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATAT and MNSO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer