HIVE vs. WULF
HIVE (HIVE Blockchain Technologies Ltd) and WULF (TeraWulf Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Capital Markets industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, HIVE returned -20.84%/yr vs 23.22%/yr for WULF. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HIVE vs. WULF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIVE achieves a 44.57% return, which is significantly lower than WULF's 126.81% return.
HIVE
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- 35.14%
- YTD
- 44.57%
- 6M
- 21.90%
- 1Y
- 91.28%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- -20.84%
- 10Y*
- —
WULF
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- 12.72%
- YTD
- 126.81%
- 6M
- 81.86%
- 1Y
- 511.74%
- 3Y*
- 163.16%
- 5Y*
- 23.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.71%
HIVE vs. WULF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIVE HIVE Blockchain Technologies Ltd | 44.57% | -9.47% | -37.09% | 214.58% | -89.09% | 39.68% | 2,600.00% | -64.10% | -92.50% |
WULF TeraWulf Inc. | 126.81% | 103.00% | 135.83% | 260.58% | -95.58% | 77.08% | 86.34% | -36.55% | 9.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIVE and WULF is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, HIVE and WULF have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
HIVE:
-$0.33
WULF:
-$2.55
HIVE:
3.19
WULF:
62.38
HIVE:
$257.14M
WULF:
$168.06M
HIVE:
$58.57M
WULF:
$107.59M
HIVE:
$87.81M
WULF:
-$132.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIVE vs. WULF — Risk / Return Rank
HIVE
WULF
HIVE vs. WULF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HIVE Blockchain Technologies Ltd (HIVE) and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIVE | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.51 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 16.26 | -15.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.96 | 43.34 | -41.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIVE vs. WULF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIVE drawdown since its inception was -97.73%, roughly equal to the maximum WULF drawdown of -98.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIVE and WULF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIVE | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.73% | -98.50% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.86% | -31.74% | -43.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.27% | -75.77% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.61% | -98.50% | +3.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.10% | -27.75% | -58.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.56% | -46.66% | -31.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.70% | 11.89% | +34.81% |
Volatility
HIVE vs. WULF - Volatility Comparison
HIVE Blockchain Technologies Ltd (HIVE) has a higher volatility of 39.86% compared to TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) at 25.07%. This indicates that HIVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WULF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIVE | WULF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.86% | 25.07% | +14.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.14% | 65.58% | +1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.73% | 106.31% | -10.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.17% | 127.55% | -34.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 109.17% | 101.43% | +7.74% |
Dividends
HIVE vs. WULF - Dividend Comparison
Neither HIVE nor WULF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIVE HIVE Blockchain Technologies Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WULF TeraWulf Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 33.22% |
Financials
HIVE vs. WULF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HIVE Blockchain Technologies Ltd and TeraWulf Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HIVE and WULF have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIVE has higher volatility (39.86%) compared to WULF (25.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIVE dropped -97.73% vs WULF's -98.50%.
WULF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.86 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIVE and WULF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer