HISF vs. AOR
HISF (First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF) and AOR (iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. HISF is actively managed, while AOR is passively managed. Over the past year, HISF returned 5.97% vs 20.12% for AOR. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HISF charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AOR.
Performance
HISF vs. AOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HISF achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than AOR's 7.96% return.
HISF
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- 5.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOR
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 20.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.46%
HISF vs. AOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HISF First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF | 0.24% | 8.39% | 3.30% |
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 7.96% | 16.44% | 8.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between HISF and AOR is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024 | 0.51 |
The correlation between HISF and AOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HISF vs. AOR — Risk / Return Rank
HISF
AOR
HISF vs. AOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF) and iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HISF | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | 2.41 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.66 | 3.43 | -0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.45 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 3.08 | -1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.30 | 13.48 | -6.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HISF | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 2.41 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.34 | 0.69 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
HISF vs. AOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HISF drawdown since its inception was -3.86%, smaller than the maximum AOR drawdown of -24.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HISF and AOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HISF | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -24.44% | +20.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.90% | -6.64% | +3.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | 0.00% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.89% | -3.48% | +2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 1.52% | -0.73% |
Volatility
HISF vs. AOR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF) is 1.23%, while iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) has a volatility of 2.70%. This indicates that HISF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HISF | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 2.70% | -1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.62% | 6.81% | -4.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.32% | 8.40% | -5.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.95% | 10.55% | -6.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.95% | 10.67% | -6.72% |
HISF vs. AOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HISF has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than AOR's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
HISF vs. AOR - Dividend Comparison
HISF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than AOR's 2.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 2.46% | 2.55% | 2.66% | 2.50% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 4.51% | 2.16% | 2.12% |
HISF First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF | 4.99% | 4.69% | 3.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HISF and AOR have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AOR has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to HISF (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HISF dropped -3.86% vs AOR's -24.44%.
On 1-year performance, AOR leads with 20.12% vs 5.97% for HISF. On fees, AOR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HISF has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AOR has performed better with a 20.12% return vs 5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AOR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for HISF.
HISF has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 2.46% for AOR.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for HISF and 0.25% for AOR.
AOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HISF and AOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer