PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HISF vs. LDSF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HISF vs. LDSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF) and First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HISF achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly lower than LDSF's 0.82% return.


HISF

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.59%
YTD
0.20%
6M
0.45%
1Y
4.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LDSF

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.82%
6M
0.92%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
5.34%
5Y*
2.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HISF vs. LDSF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HISF and LDSF is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2024

0.82

The correlation between HISF and LDSF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HISF vs. LDSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HISF
HISF Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HISF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HISF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
HISF Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HISF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
HISF Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

LDSF
LDSF Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
LDSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDSF Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LDSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDSF Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HISF vs. LDSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF) and First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HISFLDSFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.46

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

2.62

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.96

11.03

-5.08

HISF vs. LDSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HISF Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the LDSF Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HISF and LDSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HISF vs. LDSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HISF drawdown since its inception was -3.86%, smaller than the maximum LDSF drawdown of -8.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HISF and LDSF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HISFLDSFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-8.56%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.90%

-1.74%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-0.26%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.89%

-1.45%

+0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.41%

+0.42%

Volatility

HISF vs. LDSF - Volatility Comparison

First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF) has a higher volatility of 0.97% compared to First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) at 0.67%. This indicates that HISF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HISFLDSFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.97%

0.67%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.70%

1.72%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35%

2.05%

+1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.95%

3.09%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.95%

3.17%

+0.78%

HISF vs. LDSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HISF and LDSF have an expense ratio of 0.87%.


Dividends

HISF vs. LDSF - Dividend Comparison

HISF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than LDSF's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HISF
First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF
4.99%4.69%3.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LDSF
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF
4.63%4.52%4.53%4.08%2.61%1.97%2.65%3.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


HISF and LDSF have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HISF has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to LDSF (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HISF dropped -3.86% vs LDSF's -8.56%.

On 1-year performance, HISF leads with 4.96% vs 4.54% for LDSF. Both ETFs have the same 0.87% expense ratio. On volatility, LDSF has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HISF has performed better with a 4.96% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HISF and LDSF have the same expense ratio: 0.87% per year.

HISF has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 4.63% for LDSF.

HISF is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while LDSF is Short-Term Bond.

LDSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HISF and LDSF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer