PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIPS vs. SPLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HIPS vs. SPLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) and PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF (SPLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HIPS

1D
-0.79%
1M
-3.49%
YTD
3.28%
6M
2.30%
1Y
6.18%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
5.55%

SPLS

1D
-0.65%
1M
5.18%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIPS vs. SPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HIPS and SPLS is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2026

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HIPS vs. SPLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIPS
HIPS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
HIPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIPS Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HIPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIPS Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SPLS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIPS vs. SPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) and PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF (SPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIPSSPLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.70

HIPS vs. SPLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIPSSPLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

1.82

-1.59

Drawdowns

HIPS vs. SPLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIPS drawdown since its inception was -53.14%, which is greater than SPLS's maximum drawdown of -9.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIPS and SPLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HIPSSPLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.14%

-9.24%

-43.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.23%

-0.65%

-3.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.39%

-1.85%

-5.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

Volatility

HIPS vs. SPLS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HIPSSPLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.57%

15.02%

-5.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.29%

15.02%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.07%

15.02%

+3.05%

HIPS vs. SPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIPS has a 3.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLS's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

HIPS vs. SPLS - Dividend Comparison

HIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.19%, more than SPLS's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIPS
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF
11.19%11.04%10.04%10.32%10.76%8.43%9.50%6.93%8.66%7.28%7.20%8.17%
SPLS
PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF
0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HIPS and SPLS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPLS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPLS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 3.19% for HIPS.

HIPS has the higher dividend yield at 11.19%, compared with 0.22% for SPLS.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 3.19% for HIPS and 0.18% for SPLS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HIPS and SPLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer