SPLS vs. BAMA

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SPLS (PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF) and BAMA (Brookstone Active ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SPLS charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for BAMA.

Performance

SPLS vs. BAMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF (SPLS) and Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SPLS

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 5.32%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMA

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 4.38%
• YTD: 9.45%
• 6M: 10.10%
• 1Y: 21.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLS vs. BAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SPLS PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF	10.09%
BAMA Brookstone Active ETF	8.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SPLS and BAMA is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2026	0.97

Return for Risk

SPLS vs. BAMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMA

BAMA Risk / Return Rank: 70
BAMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
BAMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
BAMA Omega Ratio Rank: 74
BAMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BAMA Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPLS vs. BAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF (SPLS) and Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SPLS	BAMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.99	1.70	+0.29

Drawdowns

SPLS vs. BAMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLS drawdown since its inception was -9.24%, smaller than the maximum BAMA drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLS and BAMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPLS	BAMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.24%	-12.27%	+3.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.87%	-1.26%	-0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.60%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SPLS	BAMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.69%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.05%	9.14%	+5.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.05%	10.22%	+4.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.05%	10.22%	+4.83%

SPLS vs. BAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMA's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPLS vs. BAMA - Dividend Comparison

SPLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than BAMA's 1.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMA Brookstone Active ETF	1.30%	1.54%	1.49%	0.45%
SPLS PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPLS and BAMA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, SPLS and BAMA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, SPLS or BAMA?

On fees, SPLS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPLS or BAMA?

SPLS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BAMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPLS or BAMA?

BAMA has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.21% for SPLS.

What is the main difference between SPLS and BAMA?

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SPLS and 1.15% for BAMA.