PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPLS vs. CTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPLS vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF (SPLS) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPLS

1D
0.10%
1M
5.32%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CTAP

1D
0.68%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
22.34%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPLS vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPLS and CTAP is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2026

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPLS vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF (SPLS) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SPLS vs. CTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPLSCTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.99

2.56

-0.57

Drawdowns

SPLS vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPLS drawdown since its inception was -9.24%, roughly equal to the maximum CTAP drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPLS and CTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPLSCTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.24%

-9.02%

-0.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.16%

+4.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-2.16%

+0.29%

Volatility

SPLS vs. CTAP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPLSCTAPDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.05%

24.03%

-8.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.05%

24.03%

-8.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.05%

24.03%

-8.98%

SPLS vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPLS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPLS vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison

SPLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than CTAP's 0.64% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SPLS and CTAP have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for SPLS.

CTAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.21% for SPLS.

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SPLS and 0.10% for CTAP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPLS and CTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer