PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIPS vs. NVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HIPS vs. NVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HIPS vs. NVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HIPS
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF
1.17%1.00%13.71%9.45%
NVD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
4.20%-73.27%-93.09%-15.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIPS achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than NVD's 4.20% return.


HIPS

1D
-0.46%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
1.17%
6M
2.76%
1Y
0.21%
3Y*
10.15%
5Y*
5.30%
10Y*
6.08%

NVD

1D
-1.32%
1M
5.23%
YTD
4.20%
6M
-3.12%
1Y
-75.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HIPS vs. NVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIPS has a 3.19% expense ratio, which is higher than NVD's 1.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HIPS vs. NVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIPS
HIPS Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
HIPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIPS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
HIPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIPS Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

NVD
NVD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIPS vs. NVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIPSNVDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.01

-0.91

+0.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.12

-1.60

+1.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.80

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

-0.90

+0.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.20

-1.02

+1.23

HIPS vs. NVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIPS Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is higher than the NVD Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIPS and NVD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIPSNVDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

-0.91

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

-0.85

+1.07

Correlation

The correlation between HIPS and NVD is -0.18. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

HIPS vs. NVD - Dividend Comparison

HIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, less than NVD's 11.35% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIPS
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF
11.22%11.04%10.04%10.32%10.76%8.43%9.50%6.93%8.66%7.28%7.20%8.17%
NVD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
11.35%11.83%8.68%15.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HIPS vs. NVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIPS drawdown since its inception was -53.14%, smaller than the maximum NVD drawdown of -98.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIPS and NVD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HIPSNVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.14%

-98.85%

+45.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.98%

-84.54%

+71.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-98.60%

+94.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-80.51%

+73.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

74.07%

-70.53%

Volatility

HIPS vs. NVD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) is 3.83%, while GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) has a volatility of 21.21%. This indicates that HIPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HIPSNVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

21.21%

-17.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.53%

52.07%

-44.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.02%

82.53%

-67.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.33%

93.56%

-80.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.13%

93.56%

-75.43%