HIPS vs. DWSH
HIPS (GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF) and DWSH (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HIPS is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the TFMS HIPS Index, while DWSH is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. HIPS is passively managed, while DWSH is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HIPS returned 3.70%/yr vs -0.92%/yr for DWSH. At a correlation of -0.66, they often move in opposite directions. HIPS charges 3.19%/yr vs 3.67%/yr for DWSH.
Performance
HIPS vs. DWSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HIPS having a 2.67% return and DWSH slightly lower at 2.65%.
HIPS
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 2.67%
- 6M
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- 5.95%
- 3Y*
- 10.37%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 5.41%
DWSH
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- -7.25%
- 3Y*
- -3.79%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- —
HIPS vs. DWSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIPS GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF | 2.67% | 1.00% | 13.71% | 16.09% | -13.47% | 22.65% | -11.74% | 22.94% | -12.35% |
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 2.65% | -2.57% | 5.98% | -22.04% | 17.45% | -25.74% | -49.95% | -25.27% | 22.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIPS and DWSH is -0.54, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2018 | -0.66 |
The correlation between HIPS and DWSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.66 (all time) to -0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIPS vs. DWSH — Risk / Return Rank
HIPS
DWSH
HIPS vs. DWSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) and AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIPS | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.96 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | -0.48 | +1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.38 | -0.80 | +3.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIPS vs. DWSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIPS drawdown since its inception was -53.14%, smaller than the maximum DWSH drawdown of -82.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIPS and DWSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIPS | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.14% | -82.73% | +29.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | -15.13% | +8.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.41% | -29.23% | +13.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.28% | -32.87% | +11.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.79% | -80.92% | +76.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -63.69% | +56.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 9.99% | -7.48% |
Volatility
HIPS vs. DWSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) is 2.90%, while AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) has a volatility of 6.64%. This indicates that HIPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DWSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIPS | DWSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 6.64% | -3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.35% | 14.32% | -6.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.69% | 20.93% | -11.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.26% | 25.99% | -12.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 31.15% | -13.11% |
HIPS vs. DWSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIPS has a 3.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DWSH's 3.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIPS vs. DWSH - Dividend Comparison
HIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.26%, more than DWSH's 6.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 6.15% | 6.31% | 6.17% | 10.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HIPS GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF | 11.26% | 11.04% | 10.04% | 10.32% | 10.76% | 8.43% | 9.50% | 6.93% | 8.66% | 7.28% | 7.20% | 8.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIPS and DWSH have a correlation of -0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWSH has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to HIPS (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIPS dropped -53.14% vs DWSH's -82.73%.
On 5-year performance, HIPS leads with 3.70% vs -0.92% for DWSH. On fees, HIPS is cheaper at 3.19% per year. On volatility, HIPS has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HIPS has performed better with a 3.70% return vs -0.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HIPS is cheaper with a 3.19% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.
HIPS has the higher dividend yield at 11.26%, compared with 6.15% for DWSH.
HIPS is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DWSH is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 3.19% for HIPS and 3.67% for DWSH.
HIPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIPS and DWSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer