HIPS vs. MDIV
HIPS (GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF) and MDIV (First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - HIPS tracks the TFMS HIPS Index while MDIV tracks the NASDAQ US Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HIPS returned 5.55%/yr vs 4.66%/yr for MDIV. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HIPS charges 3.19%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for MDIV.
Performance
HIPS vs. MDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIPS achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly lower than MDIV's 7.68% return. Over the past 10 years, HIPS has outperformed MDIV with an annualized return of 5.55%, while MDIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.66% annualized return.
HIPS
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -3.49%
- YTD
- 3.28%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 10.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 5.55%
MDIV
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- 1Y
- 11.03%
- 3Y*
- 11.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.66%
HIPS vs. MDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIPS GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF | 3.28% | 1.00% | 13.71% | 16.09% | -13.47% | 22.65% | -11.74% | 22.94% | -9.30% | 6.30% |
MDIV First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund | 7.68% | 3.77% | 10.05% | 11.50% | -3.86% | 16.51% | -14.84% | 18.59% | -5.78% | 5.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIPS and MDIV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2015 | 0.71 |
The correlation between HIPS and MDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
HIPS vs. MDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HIPS
MDIV
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Energy
HIPS
MDIV
Real Estate
HIPS
MDIV
Financial Services
HIPS
MDIV
Basic Materials
HIPS
MDIV
Communication Services
HIPS
MDIV
Consumer Cyclical
HIPS
-
MDIV
Consumer Defensive
HIPS
-
MDIV
Healthcare
HIPS
-
MDIV
Industrials
HIPS
-
MDIV
Technology
HIPS
-
MDIV
-
Utilities
HIPS
-
MDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIPS vs. MDIV — Risk / Return Rank
HIPS
MDIV
HIPS vs. MDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) and First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIPS | MDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.29 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 3.27 | -2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.70 | 9.10 | -6.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIPS | MDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 1.65 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.52 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.34 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
HIPS vs. MDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIPS drawdown since its inception was -53.14%, which is greater than MDIV's maximum drawdown of -48.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIPS and MDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIPS | MDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.14% | -48.50% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | -3.39% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.41% | -9.62% | -5.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.28% | -13.02% | -8.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.14% | -48.50% | -4.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.23% | -1.14% | -3.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.39% | -4.58% | -2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 1.22% | +1.07% |
Volatility
HIPS vs. MDIV - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) has a higher volatility of 1.77% compared to First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) at 1.62%. This indicates that HIPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIPS | MDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.77% | 1.62% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.05% | 4.32% | +2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.57% | 6.71% | +2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 10.93% | +2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 15.23% | +2.84% |
HIPS vs. MDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIPS has a 3.19% expense ratio, which is higher than MDIV's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIPS vs. MDIV - Dividend Comparison
HIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.19%, more than MDIV's 6.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIPS GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF | 11.19% | 11.04% | 10.04% | 10.32% | 10.76% | 8.43% | 9.50% | 6.93% | 8.66% | 7.28% | 7.20% | 8.17% |
MDIV First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund | 6.39% | 6.51% | 6.40% | 6.08% | 6.71% | 5.30% | 6.00% | 5.90% | 6.76% | 6.04% | 6.35% | 7.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIPS and MDIV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIPS has higher volatility (1.77%) compared to MDIV (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIPS dropped -53.14% vs MDIV's -48.50%.
On 10-year performance, HIPS leads with 5.55% vs 4.66% for MDIV. On fees, MDIV is cheaper at 0.73% per year. On volatility, MDIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HIPS has performed better with a 5.55% return vs 4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MDIV is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 3.19% for HIPS.
HIPS has the higher dividend yield at 11.19%, compared with 6.39% for MDIV.
HIPS tracks TFMS HIPS Index, while MDIV tracks NASDAQ US Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 3.19% for HIPS and 0.73% for MDIV.
MDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIPS and MDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer