PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWSH vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWSH vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWSH achieves a -1.48% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 29.70% return.


DWSH

1D
2.34%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
-1.48%
6M
-2.41%
1Y
-14.79%
3Y*
-4.89%
5Y*
-2.09%
10Y*

SPMO

1D
1.31%
1M
14.80%
YTD
29.70%
6M
30.19%
1Y
46.28%
3Y*
42.80%
5Y*
24.51%
10Y*
20.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWSH vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DWSH
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF
-1.48%-2.57%5.98%-22.04%17.45%-25.74%-49.95%-25.27%22.28%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
29.70%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-10.71%

Correlation

The correlation between DWSH and SPMO is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2018

-0.45

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DWSH and SPMO has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.45 to -0.20, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

DWSH vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWSH
SPMO

Utilities

-

2.8%

Basic Materials

-0.8%
1.6%

Energy

-1.1%
3.4%

Communication Services

-4.5%
9.2%

Real Estate

-5.9%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

-7.7%
4.3%

Financial Services

-8.9%
5.9%

Healthcare

-12.0%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-12.6%
1.3%

Industrials

-13.5%
11.3%

Technology

-25.6%
52.6%

Utilities

DWSH

-

SPMO
2.8%

Basic Materials

DWSH
-0.8%
SPMO
1.6%

Energy

DWSH
-1.1%
SPMO
3.4%

Communication Services

DWSH
-4.5%
SPMO
9.2%

Real Estate

DWSH
-5.9%
SPMO
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

DWSH
-7.7%
SPMO
4.3%

Financial Services

DWSH
-8.9%
SPMO
5.9%

Healthcare

DWSH
-12.0%
SPMO
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DWSH
-12.6%
SPMO
1.3%

Industrials

DWSH
-13.5%
SPMO
11.3%

Technology

DWSH
-25.6%
SPMO
52.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWSH vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWSH
DWSH Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DWSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWSH Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
DWSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWSH Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWSH vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWSHSPMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.71

2.64

-3.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.85

3.55

-4.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.47

-0.57

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

3.76

-4.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.06

14.67

-15.74

DWSH vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWSH and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWSHSPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.71

2.64

-3.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

1.28

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

1.01

-1.45

Drawdowns

DWSH vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWSH drawdown since its inception was -82.73%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWSH and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWSHSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.73%

-30.95%

-51.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.08%

-12.70%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.23%

-20.13%

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.87%

-22.74%

-10.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.69%

0.00%

-81.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.60%

-4.60%

-59.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.40%

3.26%

+10.14%

Volatility

DWSH vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) is 5.73%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.38%. This indicates that DWSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWSHSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

7.38%

-1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.73%

14.44%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.06%

17.65%

+3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.91%

19.31%

+6.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.22%

20.31%

+10.91%

DWSH vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWSH has a 3.67% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWSH vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, more than SPMO's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWSH
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF
6.41%6.31%6.17%10.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.14%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.66%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWSH and SPMO have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (7.38%) compared to DWSH (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWSH dropped -82.73% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 24.51% vs -2.09% for DWSH. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, DWSH has been the lower-risk option at 5.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 24.51% return vs -2.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.

DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.41%, compared with 0.66% for SPMO.

DWSH is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 3.67% for DWSH and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWSH and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer