HIPS vs. CTAP
HIPS (GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF) and CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. HIPS is passively managed, while CTAP is actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HIPS charges 3.19%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CTAP.
Performance
HIPS vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIPS achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 21.95% return.
HIPS
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -3.49%
- YTD
- 3.28%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 10.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 5.55%
CTAP
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- 21.95%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIPS vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HIPS GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF | 3.28% | -1.03% |
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 21.95% | 2.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIPS and CTAP is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.22 |
HIPS vs. CTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HIPS
CTAP
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
HIPS
CTAP
-
Real Estate
HIPS
CTAP
-
Financial Services
HIPS
CTAP
Basic Materials
HIPS
CTAP
-
Communication Services
HIPS
CTAP
-
Consumer Cyclical
HIPS
-
CTAP
-
Consumer Defensive
HIPS
-
CTAP
-
Healthcare
HIPS
-
CTAP
-
Industrials
HIPS
-
CTAP
-
Technology
HIPS
-
CTAP
-
Utilities
HIPS
-
CTAP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIPS vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank
HIPS
CTAP
HIPS vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIPS | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.70 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIPS | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 2.50 | -2.27 |
Drawdowns
HIPS vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIPS drawdown since its inception was -53.14%, which is greater than CTAP's maximum drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIPS and CTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIPS | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.14% | -9.02% | -44.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.23% | -4.47% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.39% | -2.18% | -5.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | — | — |
Volatility
HIPS vs. CTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIPS | CTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.57% | 23.94% | -14.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 23.94% | -10.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 23.94% | -5.87% |
HIPS vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIPS has a 3.19% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIPS vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison
HIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.19%, more than CTAP's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HIPS GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF | 11.19% | 11.04% | 10.04% | 10.32% | 10.76% | 8.43% | 9.50% | 6.93% | 8.66% | 7.28% | 7.20% | 8.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIPS and CTAP have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 3.19% for HIPS.
HIPS has the higher dividend yield at 11.19%, compared with 0.65% for CTAP.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 3.19% for HIPS and 0.10% for CTAP.
Find the right allocation for HIPS and CTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer