HIMZ vs. HOOG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HIMZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF) and HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HIMZ returned -79.25% vs -5.11% for HOOG. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HIMZ charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HOOG.

Performance

HIMZ vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMZ achieves a -44.56% return, which is significantly lower than HOOG's -40.69% return.

HIMZ

• 1D: -3.64%
• 1M: 78.12%
• YTD: -44.56%
• 6M: -52.24%
• 1Y: -79.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HOOG

• 1D: -4.87%
• 1M: 83.12%
• YTD: -40.69%
• 6M: -48.04%
• 1Y: -5.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMZ vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF	-44.56%	-67.63%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	-40.69%	320.19%

Correlation

The correlation between HIMZ and HOOG is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

HIMZ vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMZ

HIMZ Risk / Return Rank: 5
HIMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
HIMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
HIMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7
HIMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
HIMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

HOOG

HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 12
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 18
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMZ vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HIMZ	HOOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	-0.04	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.01	0.99	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.12	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	-0.06	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.06	-0.09	-0.97

HIMZ vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the HOOG Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMZ and HOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HIMZ vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMZ drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than HOOG's maximum drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMZ and HOOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIMZ	HOOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.18%	-86.94%	-11.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-97.18%	-86.94%	-10.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.98%	-72.34%	-21.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.79%	-39.04%	-30.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	74.50%	55.98%	+18.52%

Volatility

HIMZ vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF (HIMZ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) have volatilities of 46.42% and 46.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIMZ	HOOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	46.42%	46.61%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	136.27%	101.92%	+34.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	195.06%	139.38%	+55.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	200.31%	144.74%	+55.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	200.31%	144.74%	+55.57%

HIMZ vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIMZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

HIMZ vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

HIMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than HOOG's 20.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF	4.41%	2.44%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	20.75%	12.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIMZ and HOOG in my portfolio?

HIMZ and HOOG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HIMZ or HOOG?

HOOG has higher volatility (46.61%) compared to HIMZ (46.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMZ dropped -98.18% vs HOOG's -86.94%.

Which ETF is better, HIMZ or HOOG?

On 1-year performance, HOOG leads with -5.11% vs -79.25% for HIMZ. On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, HIMZ has been the lower-risk option at 46.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HIMZ or HOOG?

Over the 1-year period, HOOG has performed better with a -5.11% return vs -79.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HIMZ or HOOG?

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HIMZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HIMZ or HOOG?

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 20.75%, compared with 4.41% for HIMZ.

What is the main difference between HIMZ and HOOG?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for HIMZ and 0.75% for HOOG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.