HIMS vs. UCO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HIMS (Hims & Hers Health, Inc.) is a stock, while UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) is Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). Over the past 5 years, HIMS returned 14.51%/yr vs 22.16%/yr for UCO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HIMS vs. UCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIMS achieves a -15.28% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 149.12% return.

HIMS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.88%
• YTD: -15.28%
• 6M: -25.79%
• 1Y: -49.74%
• 3Y*: 45.13%
• 5Y*: 14.51%
• 10Y*: —

UCO

• 1D: 2.71%
• 1M: -4.64%
• YTD: 149.12%
• 6M: 137.09%
• 1Y: 120.48%
• 3Y*: 25.90%
• 5Y*: 22.16%
• 10Y*: -11.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HIMS vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HIMS Hims & Hers Health, Inc.	-15.28%	34.28%	171.69%	38.85%	-2.14%	-55.14%	47.47%	1.02%
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil	149.12%	-29.75%	5.36%	-13.89%	39.71%	139.26%	-92.91%	20.99%

Correlation

The correlation between HIMS and UCO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2019	0.03

The correlation between HIMS and UCO shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.04 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HIMS vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIMS

HIMS Risk / Return Rank: 20
HIMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
HIMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
HIMS Omega Ratio Rank: 22
HIMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
HIMS Martin Ratio Rank: 19

UCO

UCO Risk / Return Rank: 54
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 50
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIMS vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HIMS	UCO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.52	2.12	-2.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.35	2.46	-2.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.32	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.64	3.49	-4.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.06	6.60	-7.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HIMS vs. UCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIMS Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the UCO Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIMS and UCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HIMS	UCO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.52	2.12	-2.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18	0.37	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	-0.34	+0.56

Drawdowns

HIMS vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIMS drawdown since its inception was -87.29%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIMS and UCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HIMS	UCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.29%	-99.95%	+12.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.06%	-34.77%	-43.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-78.88%	-50.38%	-28.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-79.74%	-67.24%	-12.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.98%	-99.23%	+39.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.19%	-85.49%	+42.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	47.08%	18.33%	+28.75%

Volatility

HIMS vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison

Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) has a higher volatility of 25.84% compared to ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) at 20.83%. This indicates that HIMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HIMS	UCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.84%	20.83%	+5.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.58%	46.44%	+20.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	95.97%	57.11%	+38.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.37%	59.78%	+23.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	77.20%	71.36%	+5.84%

Dividends

HIMS vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison

Neither HIMS nor UCO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HIMS and UCO in my portfolio?

HIMS and UCO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HIMS or UCO?

HIMS has higher volatility (25.84%) compared to UCO (20.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIMS dropped -87.29% vs UCO's -99.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.