HIGH vs. QQQI
HIGH (Simplify Enhanced Income ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HIGH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Simplify, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HIGH returned -2.23% vs 27.00% for QQQI. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HIGH charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.
Performance
HIGH vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIGH achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than QQQI's 10.58% return.
HIGH
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- -0.49%
- 1Y
- -2.23%
- 3Y*
- 2.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQI
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 10.58%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 27.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIGH vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF | -0.45% | 4.35% | 0.94% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 10.58% | 18.62% | 19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between HIGH and QQQI is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.58 |
The correlation between HIGH and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIGH vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
HIGH
QQQI
HIGH vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HIGH | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.34 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 2.70 | -3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | 11.63 | -12.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HIGH vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIGH drawdown since its inception was -9.50%, smaller than the maximum QQQI drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIGH and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIGH | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.50% | -20.00% | +10.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.50% | -9.61% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.18% | -2.69% | -4.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -2.21% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.64% | 2.23% | +4.41% |
Volatility
HIGH vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) is 1.61%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that HIGH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HIGH | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 6.10% | -4.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.67% | 11.35% | -7.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.74% | 14.10% | -5.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.54% | 17.34% | -7.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.54% | 17.34% | -7.80% |
HIGH vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIGH has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
HIGH vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
HIGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.34%, less than QQQI's 13.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF | 7.34% | 7.71% | 8.34% | 9.40% | 0.62% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.53% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HIGH and QQQI have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQI has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to HIGH (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HIGH dropped -9.50% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 27.00% vs -2.23% for HIGH. On fees, HIGH is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, HIGH has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 27.00% return vs -2.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HIGH is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.
QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.53%, compared with 7.34% for HIGH.
HIGH is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for HIGH and 0.68% for QQQI.
QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HIGH and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer